摘要
对马克思来说,黑格尔的重要性在于:他打破近代哲学主客分立的内在性论域,提出在历史过程中重建主体与客体的同一性,由此提供了现代性自我理解的一种重要哲学形式,为马克思探索新哲学道路准备了思想前提。但黑格尔把整个问题变成抽象的思辨问题,坚持在思想中解决该问题。马克思则立足于唯物史观,把由黑格尔开发的现代性自我理解问题变成一个政治问题,即通过革命的实践活动去改变世界和历史。卢卡奇和科耶夫对黑格尔哲学的解读,对理解马克思和黑格尔之间这种传承与批判的内在逻辑具有重要启示作用。
For the Marxists, the magnitude of Hegel lies in his breaking the internal horizon of subject-object division in modem philosophy, and in his pushing forward to rebuild the identity of subject and object. He offers a self-understanding of modernity in a significant philosophical form and a presupposition for Marx to probe into a new method. However, Hegel makes it an abstract and analytic problem, and insists on treating of it within the realm of ideology. Marx, by contrast, bases himself upon historical materialism, and makes it a political problem, i.e., changing the world and history through revolutionary practice. The interpretations of Hegel by Lukacs and Kojeve help to understand the internal logic of Marx＇ s succession of and criticism on Hegel.
出处
《复旦学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第3期15-23,共9页
Fudan Journal（Social Sciences）
基金
国家社会科学基金项目(项目批准号:04BZX001)
教育部博士点基金项目(项目批准号:03JB720009)的成果之一
作者简介
张盾（1956-），男，北京人，吉林大学哲学基础理论中心教授。
