期刊文献+

无公害添加剂预混料对育肥牛生产性能影响的研究 被引量:2

Study of the Effect on Performance of Breeding Beef Cattle about the Compounding of Nuisanceless Additive
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 选用45头试验牛按体重大小,平均分成对照组、营养调控组和中草药组3个组。后两个组作为试验组,分别饲喂课题研制的营养调控剂和中草药添加剂预混料。结果表明:营养调控组的牛平均日增重1.308kg,比对照组的增重提高34.4%,增重差异显著(P<0.05),中草药组的牛在试验后期表现出强劲的生长优势。每增重1kg活重,营养调控组比对照组少消耗饲料干物质2.25kg和少消耗精饲料1.39kg,饲料报酬提高36.4%,差异显著(P<0.05)。 Select 45 experimental beef cattle and divide into contrast group, adjusted and controlled Nutrition group and herbal group on average, according to weight size. The last two groups as experimental group, feeded adjusted and controlled Nutrition pharmaceutical and herbal additive compounding separately about seminar researched and manufactured. The experiment results indicated that the adjusted and controlled Nutrition group increases weight 1. 308 kilograms the per - day increase weigh, improves by 34.4 % than contrast group, the difference is significantly (P 〈 0.05), the same time, the experiment results demonstrated the powerful growth advantage at later stage of experiment about herbal group. Per- 1kg lives heavily to in- crease weight each time, the adjusted and controlled Nutrition group consumes the dry feed 2.25kg less than contrast group and consumes concentrated feed 1.39kgs less than the cofitrast group, the remuneration of feed is raised by 36.4 %, the difference is significantly (P 〈 0.05).
出处 《草食家畜》 2007年第1期42-45,共4页 Grass-Feeding Livestock
基金 国家科技部科技攻关项目"新疆肉牛产业化关键技术研究与示范"资助 项目编号:2004BAJD0004
关键词 营养调控预混料 中草药添加剂 生产性能 Adjusted and Controlled Nutrition Pharmaceutical Herbal additive compounding performance
作者简介 陈宁(1979-),男,硕士,河南驻马店正阳人,助理研究员,主攻动物营养与饲料科学.
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献11

共引文献36

同被引文献14

  • 1邓留坤.反刍动物微生态制剂的研究进展[J].黄牛杂志,2005,31(4):55-57. 被引量:10
  • 2Kabir A M A, Aiba Y. Prevention of Helicobacter pylori infection by bacobacilli in a gnotobiotic murine model[J]. Gut, 1997, (41) :49 - 45.
  • 3王世荣,岳寿松.试论微生态制剂对反刍动物的作用机理[C]//.中华预防医学会微生态学学会,大连:全国微生态学第八届学术讨论会论文集,2002:402-405.
  • 4S. K. Kritas, A. Govaris, G. Christodouloponlos and A. R. Bttrriel. Effect of Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subitilis Supplementation of Ewe's Feed on Sheep Milk Production and Young Lamb Mortality[J]. Blackwell Verlag,Berlin,2006, (53):170- 173.
  • 5Nikoskdainen S , Ouwehand AC, Bylund G, et al. Immune enhancement in rainbow trout by potential probiotic bacteria[J]. Fish Shellfish lmmunol. 2003,15(5) :443 - 452.
  • 6IZABELA M,KATARZYNA C,PETER G,et al.The possibilities of the application of feed additives from macroalgae in sustainable mineral animal feeding[J]. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 2009,6 (8) : 1458-1466.
  • 7ROWGHANI E, ARAB M, AKBARIAN A. Effects of a probiotic andother feed additives on performance and immune response of broiler chicks [J]. International Journal of Poultry Science, 2007,6 (4) : 261-265.
  • 8IRSHAD A.Effect of probiotics on broilers performance [J]. International Journal of Poultry Science,2006,5 (6) :593-597.
  • 9ELHUSSEINY O M, ABDA I,LAH A G, ABDELLATIF K O. The influence of biological feed additives on broiler performance [J]. International Journal of Pouhry Science, 2008,7 (9) : 862- 871.
  • 10王凤,曹兵海,张文华,李庆林,武江利.添加剂赐力健对肉牛生长性能、消化率及血清生化指标的影响[J].中国农业大学学报,2009,14(6):81-86. 被引量:6

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部