期刊文献+

急性胆源性胰腺炎内镜治疗的临床对比研究 被引量:4

Clinical contrast study of endoscopic treatment for acute biliary pancreatitis
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:通过对比观察给予不同治疗方案的3组急性胆源性胰腺炎(ABP)患者,探讨ABP经内镜治疗的优劣.方法:将119例ABP(包括SABP)患者分为内镜组(40例)、药物组(42例)、手术组(37例).对比观察3组患者治疗后症状、实验室指标恢复情况、并发症发生率、死亡率以及住院天数.结果:内镜组总并发症发生率12.5%(5/40),死亡率5.0%(2/40).手术组并发症发生率29.7%(11/37),死亡率5.4%(2/37);保守组并发症发生率23.8%(10/42),死亡率7.1%(3/42).在3组SABP中,内镜组患者在症状恢复时间、实验室指标恢复时间、及住院天数方面较手术组及保守组均明显缩短、并发症发生率较手术组及保守组均降低(P<0.05).结论:内镜治疗ABP(尤其SABP)是一项较安全、有效、经济简便、并发症少、可重复操作的治疗措施,值得临床大力推广. AIM: To explore the value of endoscopic treatment for acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP). METHODS: A total of 119 ABP (including severe ABP) patients were treated with endoscopy (n=40), drugs (n = 42), and operation (n=37), respectively. The symptoms, laboratory indexes, rates of complications and deaths as well as inhospital time were comparatively analyzed between the three groups. RESULTS: The rates of complications and deaths were 12.5% (5/40) and 5.0% (2/40) in endoscopic treatment group, 29.7% (11/37) and 5.4% (2/37) in surgical treatment group, and 23.8% (10/42) and 7.1% (3/42) in drug treatment group, respectively. The symptoms, laboratory indexes, rates of complications and deaths as well as in-hospital time were obviously improved in comparison with those in the other two groups (P 〈 0.05). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic treatment for ABP, especially SABP, is effective, safe, economical,simple and convenient, with fewer complications.
出处 《世界华人消化杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2007年第3期298-301,共4页 World Chinese Journal of Digestology
关键词 急性胆源性胰腺炎 内镜 逆行胰胆管造影 鼻胆管引流 内镜下乳头括约肌切开术 Acute biliary pancreatitis Endoscopy Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage Endoscopic sphincterotomy
作者简介 通讯作者:陈晓琴,730050,甘肃省兰州市.兰州市第一人民医院消化内科.gslztys@126.com电话:0931—2654135
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献37

共引文献297

同被引文献53

引证文献4

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部