期刊文献+

审计意见的决定因素:来自中国上市公司的证据 被引量:26

Determinants of Audit Opinion:Evidence from China's Listed Firms
原文传递
导出
摘要 利用中国上市公司和相应会计师事务所2001—2003年的综列数据,本文研究了审计意见和会计师事务所规模、上市公司的风险和盈余管理等因素之间的关系。本文发现有破产风险的、进行盈余管理的或小规模的上市公司更可能得到非标准审计意见。如果它们又是大会计师事务所的客户,则得到非标意见的概率更大。本文不支持合资会计师事务所的审计质量更高的结论。 Using a panel data base of both audit firms and listed firms in China from 2001 to 2003, we examine the relationship between audit firm size and audit opinions in China's relatively competitive auditing market for publicly listed firms. We find that listed firms which are more likely to go bankruptcy, firms which have engaged in earnings management and those with small sizes are more likely to get dirty opinions. There is also a positive relation between audit firm size and the probability of getting dirty opinion. Our research, however, does not support the hypothesis that joint venture audit firms are stricter in issuing audit opinions.
出处 《中国会计评论》 2006年第2期345-362,共18页 China Accounting Review
基金 香港大学中国金融研究中心提供的资助 Endeavour Australia Cheung Kong Award的资助 香港大学基金会和Hong Kong Research Grant Council的资助.
关键词 审计意见 审计质量 事务所规模 中国审计市场 Audit Opinion,Audit Quality, Audit Firm Size, China's Audit Market
作者简介 通讯作者:李春涛,E-mail:chtl@econ.hku.hk。
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献61

  • 1陈小悦,徐晓东.股权结构、企业绩效与投资者利益保护[J].经济研究,2001,36(11):3-11. 被引量:789
  • 2Pound John. Proxy Contests and the Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight. Journal of Financial Economics, 1988, 20: 237-265.
  • 3Qi D, Wu W, Zhang H. Shareholding Structure and Corporate Performance of Partially Privatized Firms: Evidence from Listed Chinese Companies. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 2000, 8, Issue 5, October: 557-610.
  • 4Tian L. Government Shareholding and the Value of China's Modem Firms, Working Paper, London School of Business, 2003.
  • 5Shleifer Andrei, and Robert W Vishny. Large Shareholders and Corporate Control. Journal of Political Economy, 1986, 94 (3):461-488.
  • 6Stulz R M. Managerial Control of Voting Rights: Financing Policies and the Market for Corporate Control. Journal of Financial Economics, 1988, 20: 25-54.
  • 7Xiaonian Xu, Yan Wang. Ownership Structure and Corporate Governance in Chinese Listed Firms, China Economic Review,1999. 10: 75-98.
  • 8Barberis N, Boycko M, Shleifer A, Tsukanova N. How does Privatization Work? Evidence from Russian Shops. Journal of Political Economy, 1996, 104: 764-90.
  • 9Berle A, Means G. The Modern Corporation and Private Property, Macmillan, New York, 1932.
  • 10Bharadwaj A S, S G B Bharadwaj and B R Konsynski. Information Technology Effects on Firm Performance a Measured by Tobin's Q. Management Science, 1999, 45: 1008-1024.

共引文献324

同被引文献473

引证文献26

二级引证文献267

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部