摘要
在对博弈中的纳什均衡、经济中的一般均衡和帕累托最优的概念进行比较之后,从博弈支付函数的角度利用合作博弈与非合作博弈之间的区别,提出了博弈机会损失的概念,以博弈机会损失与为消除博弈机会损失而采取的措施的成本之间的权衡作为是否采取措施的判据。通过对企业与客户间的附加成本的博弈和企业与客户间的信号博弈为例,分析了用于分析现实问题需要的博弈机会损失问题。
Based on the comparison of Nash -Equilibrium, general equihbrium and Pareto optimum, opportunity loss of game is defined from the view of payment function, according to the difference between cooperation game and non - cooperation game. Whether a measure is taken to eliminate the opportunity loss of game depends on the trade - off between opportunity loss of game and the cost of taking measures. Finally the opportunity loss of game is analyzed through the examples of annexed cost game and signaling game between business and customer.
出处
《武汉理工大学学报（信息与管理工程版）》
CAS
2006年第12期76-80,共5页
Journal of Wuhan University of Technology：Information & Management Engineering
基金
国家自然科学基金资助项目(70573012)
北京市教委重点学科建设资助项目(XK100070534)
关键词
博弈机会损失
附加成本博弈
信号博弈
遗传算法
opportunity loss of game
annexed cost game
signaling game
genetic algorithm
作者简介
孙树垒（1974-），男，山东淄博人，北京理工大学管理与经济学院博士研究生．
