摘要
长期以来,日本国内一直存在第二次世界大战“日本是有条件投降”的论调,中国少数学者也持相同的观点。“日本是有条件投降”论者都认为:无条件投降是战胜和战败双方都不允许对投降先提出条件,因此,既然在日本投降之前,就有了《波茨坦公告》的“条件”,日本的投降就属于“有条件投降”。但从史实、概念、逻辑、法律等方面来看,受降与投降是两个概念,无条件投降是投降者无附加条件地接受胜利者提出的受降条件的投降,德国和日本是国家无条件投降的典型。
For a long time, Japan has argued that its surrender in the Second World War is conditional and a few Chinese scholars have followed it. They hold that since ＂unconditional surrender＂ means that both the winner and the loser are not allowed to put forward the surrender terms, there is The Potsdam Proclamation before Japan＇s surrender and thus it is a ＂condition＂. This paper argues from the perspectives of historical facts, concept, logic and law that ＂acceptance of a surrender ＂is a different concept from ＂surrender＂, and＂ unconditional surrender＂ refers to the loser＇s unconditionally accepting the surrender terms. Both Germany＇s and Japan＇s surrender in World War Ⅱ are the cases in point.
出处
《云南师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2006年第6期61-68,共8页
Journal of Yunnan Normal University：Humanities and Social Sciences Edition
关键词
投降
受降
条件
“四国公告”
《波茨坦公告》
《开罗宣言》
surrender
acceptance of a surrender
term
Proclamation of Four Allied Nations
The Potsdam Proclamation
Cairo Declaration
作者简介
邱维骥（1933-），男，云南昆明人，中学高级教师，研究方向为抗日战争史。
