摘要
父亲的形象在杜拉斯的作品中很少出现,似乎是缺失的。而杜拉斯文本中的“父亲”问题亦很少受到批评界的关注。本文试以拉康关于父亲的理论解读其作品,证明杜拉斯作品中父亲的缺失与死亡是象征性的。在家庭关系与社会关系中,父亲的作用与地位并不是“真实的父亲”所自然具有。在父亲—母亲—孩子三角关系结构中,父亲的位置往往由“父亲之名”来替代,这一能指可以通过情人、儿子、母亲的话语,甚至某些物体来体现。因此,“父亲之名”的能指并不与“父亲”这个人物有必然的联系,也不固定指向某人或某物。“父亲之名”体现的是父亲的“菲勒斯”作用,即他在法律与经济方面的象征意义。
The figure of the father is seemingly absent in Duras＇ works ; therefore, questions related to ＂Father＂ in her text seldom receive significant attention from the critics. This essay attempts to analyze her works with Lacan＇ s theories on ＂Father＂ to reach the conclusion that the absence and the death of the father are symbolic. In the family and social structure, the role and importance of father are not coherently possessed by the ＂real father＂. In a father-mother-child triangle, father＇ s position is often replaced by ＂the Name-of-the-Father＂. This signifier can be demonstrated by lover, son, mother＇s words, or even some objects. Therefore, the signifier of ＂the Name-of-the-Father＂ does not necessarily relate to the character of ＂father＂, nor does it point to a certain person or a certain object. What ＂the Name-of-the-Father＂ really reflects is father＇ s ＂phallus＂ function, or his symbolic significance in law and economic aspects.
出处
《外国文学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第5期97-104,共8页
Foreign Literature Studies
关键词
杜拉斯
拉康
父亲之名
能指
Duras Lacan the Name of the Father signifier
作者简介
范荣，法国巴黎八大法国文学博士，安徽大学外语学院教师，主要研究方向为法国文学、文学与精神分析。Fan Rong, doctor of French literature at the University Paris 8, is teaching at the School of Foreign Languages, Anhui University （Hefei 230039, China）. Her research focuses on French literature and literature and psychoanalysis. Email： zgfrong@yahoo.com.cn
