摘要
社会秩序的形成和维系产生了对权威判断的需求,而“有错必纠”对我们而言又几乎是天经地义的原则,所以既判例理论与再审制度的冲突与调和成为民事诉讼理论中不可忽视的问题。通过对既判力本质论的分析与比较,可以看到对待再审制度的不同态度在程序正义和实体正义价值目标的统一之下是可以协调的。再审制度是有其存在的合理性的,而此种合理性又应当是有严格条件限制的。在我国,对既判力的立法和再审的启动便是值得审视之处。
The formation and maintenance of social order have the authority to judge demand, and the ＂facts＂ for us is almost perfectly principle, the jurisprudence of both theory and retrial system become civil conflict and reconcile the theory can not be neglected. Sentenced essence of the theory through the analysis and comparison, we can see the different attitudes toward retrial system entities in the process of justice and the value of justice is the goal of reunification can be coordinated. Retrial system is the rationality of its existence, and reasonable and should be such strict limitations. In China, for sentenced legislative and retrial starting point is worth examining.
出处
《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》
2006年第3期61-63,共3页
Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice
关键词
既判力
再审的合理性
再审的条件
have been sentenced
rationality of retrial
condition of retrial
作者简介
徐进静（1982-），女（汉族），四川自贡人，广东商学院诉讼法学研究生，主要从事诉讼法学研究。
