摘要
为比较3种化学抗球虫药对兔球虫病的疗效，将50只家兔随机均分为5组，Ⅰ组为无感染不用药空白对照组，Ⅰ～Ⅳ组各兔均感染，Ⅱ组为不用药对照组，Ⅲ组为莫能菌素组，Ⅳ组为地克珠利组，Ⅴ组为氯苯胍组，用药组饲喂含药饲料3d，人工感染兔混合球虫卵囊1×10^5个，观察效果。结果表明，地克珠利组和莫能菌素组对抑制兔球虫卵囊产生，减轻肠道病理损害，降低幼兔死亡率，增加兔只体重和提高饲料转化率的作用极显著，优于氯苯胍（P〈0．01）；氯苯胍抗球虫效果较差，与不用药对照组差异不显著（P〉0．05），说明氯苯胍不宜单一长期使用，应选用新型高效抗球虫药或变换用药或联合用药。
In order to compare the efficacies of Diclazuril, Rumensin and Robenidine against rabbit coccidiosis, rabbits （n=50） were randomly grouped into uninfected and unmedicated treatment （ Ⅰ ）, infected and unmedicated treatment （ Ⅱ ）, Rumensin treatment （ Ⅲ ）, Diclazuril treatment （Ⅳ） and Robenidine treatment （ Ⅴ ）. Treatment Ⅲ , Ⅳ and Ⅴ were artificially infected with rabbit coccidian oocysts （1×10^5） after being fed with drugs for three days. The results indicated that Diclazuril was the same effective as Rumensin and more effective than Robenidine in reducing oocyst output and controlling Eimeria spp. lesion and Coccidosis mortality, and increasing body-weight gain and feed efficency; the effectiveness of Robenidine was poor and had little difference from that of infected and unmedicated. It was concluded that Robenidine was not fit to be applied continually and solely, new highly effective medicine should be used or medicines should be used alternately and combinatively against rabbit coccidiosis.
出处
《福建农业学报》
CAS
2006年第2期135-137,共3页
Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences
关键词
化学药物
兔球虫病
疗效
chemical medicine
rabbit coccidiosis
efficacy of treatment
作者简介
吴昌标（1970～），男，硕士，高级讲师，主要从事动物临床疾病防治研究。
