期刊文献+

椎间植骨对腰椎内固定棒应力分布的影响 被引量:17

Impact of bone graft in intervertebral disc on load distribution after instrumentation
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较椎体间植骨对腰椎内固定棒应力分布的影响,为减少腰椎内固定棒在临床应用中的疲劳提供力学依据。方法:选用6具人新鲜腰椎标本,置入脊柱通用椎弓根螺钉系统(AO/ASIF的USS系统)依次测定保留椎间盘、去除部分椎间盘以及椎间植骨后固定棒的应力,并对三种情况下腰椎内固定的应力分布进行分析比较。结果:去除部分椎间盘组USS系统内固定棒承受应力最大,保留正常椎间盘组最小,而椎间植骨组介于二者之间,应力小于去除部分椎间盘组(P<0.01),大于保留正常椎间盘组(P<0.01)。结论:椎间植骨对内固定棒具有有效的抗疲劳保护作用,为腰椎固定提供有效保证,支持临床上减压后椎间植骨内固定对腰椎失稳治疗的应用。 Objective:To compare the impact of bone graft in intervertebral disc on load distribution after instrumentation,and to provide the mechanical gist into the fatigue status induced by instrumention.Method: Six fresh samples of human lumbar vertebras were placed with the universal spine system (USS).Stress along the USS for intact intervertebral disc(group A),partial removal of intervertebral disc(group B) and bone graft in intervertebral disc (group C) were measured respectively.Result:The USS in group B shared more stress than in group C ;the USS in group C shared least stress during all phase of movement.Conclusion: Bone graft in intervertebral disc can provide effective protection to the instrument itself which can be used to treat lumbar distabilization due to decompressional surgery.
出处 《中国脊柱脊髓杂志》 CAS CSCD 2006年第7期531-535,共5页 Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord
关键词 腰椎 应力 植骨 内固定器 Lumbar Stress Bone graft Instrument
作者简介 罗鸣:男(1978-),硕士研究生,研究方向:脊柱疾病的诊治 通讯作者:罗卓荆,第四军医大学西京医院全军骨科研究所 电话:(029)84775285 E-mail:zjluo@fmmu.edu.cn
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1董天华,唐天驷,郑祖根,沈忆新,成茂华,华金明.椎弓根钢板治疗胸腰椎骨折存在的问题(附90例分析)[J].骨与关节损伤杂志,1993,8(1):16-18. 被引量:41
  • 2Wittenberg RH,Shea M,Edward WT,et al.A biomechanical study of the fatigue characteristics of thoracolumbar fixation implants in a calf spine modle[J].Spine,1992,17(6):121-128.
  • 3King AI,Prasad P,Ewing CC.Mechanism of spinal injury due to candocephalad acceleration[J].Orthop Clin North (Am),1975,6(1):19-31.
  • 4Yang KH,King AI.Mechanism of facet load transmission as a hypothesis for low-back pain[J].Spine,1984,9(6):557-565.
  • 5辛兵,侯筱魁,李永刚.脊柱内固定器的应力遮挡[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2000,7(2):154-155. 被引量:9
  • 6Cunningham BW,Sefter JC,Shono Y,et al.Static and cyclical biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw spinal constructs[J].Spine,1993,18 (12):1677-1688.
  • 7Ebelke DK,Asher MA,Neff JR,et al.Survivorship analysis of VSP spine instrumentation in the treatment of thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures[J].Spine,1991,16 (Suppl 8):S428-S432.
  • 8McLain RF,Sparling E,Benson DR.Early failure of shortsegment pedicle instrumentation for thoracolumbar fractures:a preliminary report[J].J Bone Joint Surg (Am),1993,75 (2):162-167.
  • 9Cripton PA,Jain GM,Wittenberg RH,et al.Load-sharing characteristics of stabilized lumbar spine segments[J].Spine,2000,25(2):170-179.

二级参考文献6

  • 1[1]Pavolairer P, Karahariju E, Slatis P,et al. Effect of rigid plate fixation on structure and mineral content of cortical bone[J]. Clin Orthop,1987,136(2):287~293.
  • 2[2]Cann CE.Quantitative CT for determination of bone mineral density:a review[J].Radiology,1988,166(4):509~516.
  • 3[3]McAfee PC,Farely ID,Sutterlin CE,et al.The effect of spinal implant rigidity on vertebral bone density:a canine model[J].spine,1991,16(6s):190~197.
  • 4[4]Farely ID,McAfee PC,Gurr KR,et al.Quantitative histologic study of the influence of spinal in strumentation on lumbar fusion:a canine model[J].J Orthop res,1989,7(5):709~722.
  • 5[5]Kotani Y,Cunningham BW,Cappuccino A,et al. The role of spinal instrumentation on lunbar posterolateral fusion[J].Spine,1996,21(3):278~287.
  • 6[6]Halvorson TL,Kelley LA,Thomas KA,et al.Effect of bone mineral density on pedical screw fixation[J].1994.19(21):2415~2420.

共引文献48

同被引文献139

引证文献17

二级引证文献116

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部