摘要
目的:比较老年脑梗死患者浅静脉留置针生理盐水封管和肝素钠封管的效果。方法:将136例老年脑梗死患者随机分成生理盐水封管组及肝素钠封管组,每组68例,两组分别在浅静脉留置针输液完毕时采用生理盐水或肝素钠(50 U/mL)封管,比较两组患者浅静脉留置针阻管发生率及阻管发生时间。结果:生理盐水封管组浅静脉留置针阻管发生率为22.1%,而肝素钠封管组为7.4%,后者显著少于前者(P<0.05)。浅静脉留置针阻管发生时间生理盐水封管组为(2.96±0.913)d,而肝素钠封管组为(6.00±0.791)d,后者阻管发生时间显著长于前者(P<0.001)。结论:老年脑梗死患者浅静脉留置针肝素钠封管优于生理盐水封管。
Objective： To compare two methods of washing superficial vein detained needle with normal saline or with heparin sodium in patients with cerbral infarction. Methods： One hundred and thirty six patients with cerbral infarction from June of 2002 to June of 2004 in our department were divided randomly into two groups, which used respectively normal saline or heparin sodium in 50 units per milliliter normal saline to wash superficial vein detained needle. Eachgroup had 68 patients. The occlusion rate and occlusion time of superficial vein detained needle were compared between two groups. Results ：The occlusion rate of superficial vein detained needle was 22. 1 in group of normal saline, but 7.4% in group of heparin sodium （P〈0.05）. The occlusion time of superficial vein detained needle was 2. 964±0. 913 days and 6.00±0. 791 days in group of normal saline and group of heparin sodium, respectively （P〈0.001）. Conclusion：The method with heparin sodium to wash superficial vein detained needle may be superior to that with normal saline in patients with cerbral infarction.
出处
《实用临床医学（江西）》
CAS
2006年第7期125-126,130,共3页
Practical Clinical Medicine
关键词
老年人
脑梗死
静脉留置针
封管
elder
cerbral infarction
vein detained needle
close vein detained needle
作者简介
曾晟（1971-），女,本科，主管护师，主要从事老年病康复研究。
