摘要
梁启超新史学思想与日本学术资源中介的关系,是需要深入探讨的重要课题。本文以实证的方法,经具体的对勘比照,探研其与浮田和民《史学原论》、《西洋上古史》及其他日本史家与史著的关联,通过众多的例证与比喻的分析,以更明晰地揭示其思想形成的知识背景,阐明其新史学的来源具有多元采撷的特征,从而在更广阔的语境中予以把握,厘清其间复杂的关联与思想脉络。总结这方面的经验教训,对今天也有重要的启示意义。
This article studies the relation between Liang Qichao＇s neo-history theory and Japanese academic resources. It makes a comparative studies between Liang＇s theory and many Japanese historians and history writings, especially Kazumi Ukita＇s History Introduction and Ancient History of Western Countries. Through large amounts of examples and analysis, it clearly reveals the knowledge background of the formation of his theory, points out that neo-history theory had multiple origins. It therefore figures out the complex correlations and structures of Liang＇s theory within expansive background.
出处
《社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第6期5-30,共26页
Journal of Social Sciences
关键词
梁启超
新史学
日本
学术资源
多元特征
Liang Qichao
Neo-history Theory
Japan
Academic Resources
Multiple Characters
