摘要
目的:探讨D型人格量表在我国大学生中的信效度,考察D型人格在我国人群中的分布及其文化含义。方法:将Denollet的D型人格量表(DS14)修订成中文版问卷,以艾森克人格问卷简式量表为效标,施测于我国两所大学的学生。结果:DS14中文版两个分量表的内部一致性系数消极情感为0．92,社交压抑为0．79。结构效度符合两因素的理论构想(消极情感的题目负荷为0．71-0．87,社交压抑的题目负荷为0．53-0．75),验证性因素分析结果为X2／df=3．19,GFI=0．90,NNFI=0．91,CFI=0．91,RM- SEA=0．06。消极情感与神经质的相关系数为0．69,社交压抑与外向性的相关为-0．69,消极情感与精神质的相关为0．19(均P<0．05),社交压抑与精神质的相关无显著。我国被试在消极情感和社交压抑方面没有性别差异,在D型人格的比例上也是如此。但我国大学生中D型人格类型的比率为31．6％,远高于荷兰普通人群(21％)。结论:DS14中文版是测量个体消极情感和社交压抑倾向的有效工具,可用于鉴别具有D 型人格的高危人群。
Objective： To examine the reliability and validity of Chinese version of Type D Personality Scale in Chinese college students and the prevalence of type D personality in Chinese culture. Methods： This study adapted Type D Personality Scale （ DS14 ） into Chinese version and administered it in 280 college students and got 266 qualified responses. Results： Our results indicated that DS14 was internal consistent, and well validated against EPQ （NA had positive correlation with Neuroticism of EPQ, r = 0. 69 ; SI had negative correlation with Extroversion, r = -0. 69 ） . Corresponding to theoretical frame of type D personality, factor analysis of DS14 extracted two factors （ the loads of NA were 0. 71 - 0. 87, that of SI were 0. 53 - 0. 75 ）, supported by two-dimension structure of confirmatory factor analysis （x^2/df = 3.19, GFI = 0.90, NNFI = 0.91, CFI = 0.91, RMSEA = 0.06） . Chinese college students sample showed no gender difference on negative affectivity and social inhibition, as well as the proportion of type D personality. But type D personality was more prevalent in Chinese participants （31.6%） than Nctherland＇s healthy population （21%） . Conclusion： Chinese version of DSI4 was an effective measurement for negative affectivity and social inhibition that could identify high-risk population with type D personality.
出处
《中国心理卫生杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2006年第5期313-316,共4页
Chinese Mental Health Journal
关键词
D型人格量表
心理测量学研究
信度
效度
Type D Personality Scale
psychometric studies
reliability
validity
作者简介
通讯作者
