期刊文献+

MR扩散加权成像在肾功能评价中的应用 被引量:17

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in functional study of kidney
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨MR扩散加权成像在肾功能评价中的价值。方法健康志愿者15例作为对照组,慢性肾病(chron ic k idney d isease,CKD)患者32例(其中肌酐正常组12例,肌酐升高组20例)作为研究组。分别测量各例的表观扩散系数(apparent d iffusion coeffic ient,ADC)并与血清肌酐水平及肌酐清除率对比分析。结果15例志愿者在扩散敏感梯度系数(b值)取50、100、400 s/mm2时平均ADC值分别为(405.366±35.964)×10-5mm2/s、(339.646±23.059)×10-5mm2/s、(254.532±13.676)×10-5mm2/s。CKD组病例中肌酐正常组分别ADC值为(336.622±12.879)×10-5mm2/s、(308.142±20.998)×10-5mm2/s、(211.398±14.604)×10-5mm2/s,肌酐升高组分别为(307.717±84.930)×10-5mm2/s、(265.415±57.754)×10-5mm2/s、(201.672±26.411)×10-5mm2/s,ADC值均低于正常对照组(肌酐正常组与正常对照组比较的t值分别为9.720、5.190、11.093,P值均<0.05;肌酐升高组与正常对照组比较的t值分别为6.533、7.382、10.864,P值均<0.05)。肌酐升高组病例的平均血清肌酐水平为(828.490±699.350)μmol/L,肌酐升高组病例的ADC值与血清肌酐水平负相关,但无统计学意义(b值分别为50、100、400 s/mm2时相关系数分别为-0.272、-0.283、-0.023,P值均>0.05)。肌酐升高组病例的平均肌酐清除率为(15.405±14.541)m l/m in,该组病例的ADC值与肌酐清除率呈弱正相关(b值分别为50、100、400 s/mm2时相关系数分别为0.511、0.430、0.335,P值均<0.05,ADC值与肌酐清楚率呈正相关,但相关关系不密切)。结论对肾脏进行扩散加权成像及ADC值测量是1种有一定潜力且无创的肾功能评价的手段。 Objective To evaluate the value of diffusion-weighted MRI in the functional study of kidney. Methods Fifteen volunteers as control group and 32 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) were underwent DW MR imaging in a dehydrated state. In CKD group, 12 cases were with normal serum creatinine (Scr) level ( CKD group 1 ) and 20 cases with Scr increased in different level ( CKD group 2 ). Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) value of each kidney of all groups was measured and compared of their relationships with clinical data. Results The ADC values of 15 volunteers in different b values (50, 100, 400) were (405.366 ± 35.9639) ×10^-5 mm^2/s, (339.646 ± 23.0594) ×10^-5 mm^2/s and (254.532±13.6763) × 10^-5mm^2/s, respectively. The ADC values of CKD group 1 were (336.622 ± 12. 879) ×10^-5 mm^2/s , ( 308. 142 ± 20. 998 ) ×10^-5 mm^2/s, and ( 211. 398 ± 14. 604) ×10^-5 mm^2/s, respectively. And of CKD group 2 were (307. 717 ±84. 930) ×10^-5 mm^2/s (265.415 ±57. 754) ×10^-5 mm^2/s, and (201. 672 ±26.411) ×10^-5 mm^2/s respectively. The ADC values in CKD group were lower than those of the normal kidneys ( t values compared between the control group and CKD group 1 were 9. 720, 5. 190, 11. 093 separately, between the control group and CKD goup 2 were 6. 533, 7. 382, 10. 864 separately in different b values, with all P values less than 0. 05 ). In CKD group 2, it had been showed negtive correlation between the level of Scr and ADC values of kidney, with mean level of Scr of (828. 490 ± 699. 350) μmol/L, but this was confirmed of no statistical meanings (the coefficient correlation were -0. 272,- 0. 2834 -0. 023 separately in different b values, with p values more than 0. 05 ). For the creatinine clearance rate( Cer), it showed a weak positive correlation with ADC values of CKD group 2 ( the coefficient correlation were 0. 511,0. 430 0. 335 separately, with P values less than 0. 05 ). Conclusion Diffusion-weighted MRI imaging and in vivo measurement of ADC values have the potential for use as a noninvasive means to explore the functional status of the kidney.
出处 《中华放射学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第5期518-521,共4页 Chinese Journal of Radiology
关键词 磁共振成像 肾功能试验 对比研究 Magnetic resonance imaging Diffusion Renal function test Comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1任小军.腹部磁共振成像的应用和进展[J].国外医学(临床放射学分册),2003,26(4):231-234. 被引量:4
  • 2郑晓林,徐辉雄,吕明德,谢晓燕,徐作峰.扩散加权MRI定性诊断肝脏局灶性病变的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(2):173-176. 被引量:67
  • 3王毅翔,江浩.磁共振肾脏功能成象进展[J].国外医学(泌尿系统分册),1999,19(5):212-214. 被引量:3
  • 4Namimoto T,Yamashita Y, Mitsuzaki K, et aL Measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in diffuse renal disease by diffusion-weighted echoplanar MR Imaging J Magn Reson Imaging, 1999,9:832-837.
  • 5Fukuda Y, Ohashi I, Hanafusa K, et al. Anisotropic diffusion in kidney:apparent diffusion coefficient measurements for clinical use.J Magn Reson Imaging,2000,11:156-160.
  • 6Ries M, Jones RA, Basseau F, et al. Diffusion tensor MRI of the human kidney. J Magn Reson Imaging,2001,14:42-49.

二级参考文献32

  • 1汤光宇,姚冀平,徐彧,刘勇,李伟,顾伟中.鉴别良、恶性椎体骨折的最佳扩散敏感系数值的探讨[J].中华放射学杂志,2004,38(6):615-619. 被引量:29
  • 2Reinhold C, Taourel P, Bret PM, et al. Choledocholithiasis: evaluation of MR cholangiography for diagnosis. Radiology,1998, 209(2) :435-442.
  • 3L Yanashita Y, Nmnimoto T, Mitsuzaki K, et al. Mucin - producing tumor of the pancreas:diagnostic value of diffusion weighted echo - planar MR imaging. Radiology, 1998, 208(3) :605-609.
  • 4Prasad P, Priama A. Functional imaging of the kidneys with fast MRI techniques. Eur J Radiol, 1999, 29(2) : 133-148.
  • 5Prasad PV, Cannillo J, Chavez DR, et al. Contrast- enhenced MR angiography and first - pass renal perfussion imaging using MS- 325, an intravascular contrast agent. Acad Radiol, 1998, 5[Suppl 1] :219-222.
  • 6Umschaden HW, Szolar D, Gasser J, et al. Small - bowel disease: comparison of MR enteroclysis imaging with conventional enteroclysis and surgical findings. Radiology, 2000, 215(3):717-725.
  • 7Low RN, Francis IR. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with IV gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.AJR, 1997,169(4) : 1051-1059.
  • 8Regan F, Beall DP, Bohlman ME, et al. Fast MR imaging and the detection of small- bowel obstruction. AJR, 1998, 170(6):1465-1469.
  • 9Kanematsu M, Hoshi H, Itoh K, et al. Focal hepatic lesion detection: comparison of four fat- suppressed T2 -weighted MR imaging pulse sequence. Radiology, 1999, 211(2) : 363-371.
  • 10Pawluk RS, Tummala S, Brown J J, et al. A retrospective analysis of the accuracy of T2 weightedimages and dynamic Gadolinium- enhanced sequences in the detection of focal hepaticlesions. J Magn Reson Imaging, 1999, 9 (2) : 266-273.

共引文献70

同被引文献175

引证文献17

二级引证文献108

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部