期刊文献+

术中腹腔神经丛阻滞术对不能切除的胰腺癌疼痛减轻及生活质量的影响 被引量:10

Effects of intra-abdominal neurolytic celiac plexus block during palliative operation on the quality of life,pain-relief and complication in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对不能切除的胰腺癌行姑息手术的同时行无水酒精腹腔神经丛阻滞术,观察其镇痛效果、并发症及对生活质量的影响。方法选取122例肿块不能切除、伴消化道梗阻、腹部和/或腰背部癌性疼痛的胰腺癌患者,其中姑息手术加腹腔神经丛阻滞术80例患者归为A组,仅行姑息手术42例患者归为B组,比较两组术后疼痛缓解情况、临床受益反应及术后不良反应。结果A与B组术后2周疼痛完全缓解率分别为52.5%和11.9%,总有效率分别为96%和47.6%;半年疼痛完全缓解率分别为20.7%和0%,总有效率分别为68.9%和11.1%;两者在术后各时间点(2周、1个月、3个月、6个月)之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组治疗前后KPS评分比较差异有统计学意义(t=6.864,P<0.05),两组治疗前后KPS评分差值比较亦有统计学意义(t=5.326,P<0.05)。术后两组无严重并发症和手术死亡。结论经腹行腹腔神经丛阻滞术具有直视下定位准确、疼痛缓解满意、安全程度高等优点,能有效改善患者的生活质量。 Objective To investigate the effects of intra- abdominal neurolytie celiac plexus block (NCPB) with anhydrous alcohol during palliative operation (PA) on the quality of life (QOL), pain- relief and complication in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer (UPC). Methods 112 patients suffering from pain due to inoperable pancreatic cancer, randomly divided into group A ( n = 80) and group B ( n = 42), were treated with palliative operation, while patients in group A were treated with NCPB at the same time. Intensity of pain (VAS- pain), KPS and complication were compared among groups per- and 2 weeks, 6 months post - operation. Results The effective rates and eomphte pain - relief rates in groups A and B were 96 %, 47.6 % and 52.5 %, 11.9 %, respectively, 2 weeks after operation, whih 68.9 %, 11.1% and 20.7 %, 0 %, respectively, 6 months post - operation( P 〈 0.05). In groups A and B, KPS scores were significantly different between per - and post - operation ( P 〈 0.01), and no severe complications and death. Conclusion QOL of UPC patients might be improved effectively by using NCPB with precise orientation, satisfying effects of pain - relief and safety.
出处 《临床外科杂志》 2006年第2期114-116,共3页 Journal of Clinical Surgery
关键词 腹腔神经丛阻滞术 胰腺癌 疼痛 癌性 neurolytic celiac plexus block pancreatic cancer cancer pain
作者简介 杨俊(1971-).男,硕士,主治医师。
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1王春友.重视胰腺癌分期评估及综合治疗的科学抉择[J].中国实用外科杂志,2004,24(5):259-261. 被引量:5
  • 2Burris HA Ⅲ, Moore MJ, Andersen J, et al. Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial[J]. J Clin Oncol,1997,15(6) :2403-2413.
  • 3周军,念丁芳,黄祥龙,曹庆选,李文华.CT引导下阻滞腹腔神经丛治疗顽固性癌痛[J].介入放射学杂志,2004,13(1):64-65. 被引量:4
  • 4Tim J. Treatment of cancer- rclatccl pain: When orally administered medicationsfail[J]. Mayo Clin Proc, 1994, 69(5) :473-480.
  • 5Eisenberg E, Carr DB, Chalmers TC, et al. Neurolytic celiac plexus block for treatment of cancer pain: A meta- analysis [J]. Anesth Analg, 1995, 80(2) :290.
  • 6Ischia S, Polati E, Finco G, et al. Celiac block for the treatment of pancreatic pain. Curr Rev[J]. Pain, 2000, 4(2) : 127-133.

二级参考文献4

共引文献7

同被引文献142

引证文献10

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部