摘要
在对法律公正的憧憬中,法律是值得信仰的,但在当下判决书中经常看到的多是武断与掩饰,八股式文体的判决书缺乏充分的论证,让人看不出判决或改判的理由。在走向依法治国的历史进程中,我们需要的是一份阳光下的判决书,一份有着严密论证、详尽说理的判决书,一份旁征博引、法理透彻的判决书。判决需要论证,据以形成判决的“法律”更需要论证,不经过论证的“法律”缺乏正确性和可接受性。裁判文书中对论证理论的运用,为裁判结论的达致提供技术性支持,为裁判结论形成过程中个体的价值判断提供规范性的规则与方法,在整个国家制度建构中有重要的意义。
In the hope just to the law, the law deserves faith, it is mostly dogmatic and cover up but often see in the court verdict instantly , the court verdicts of the eight - part essay type recreation and sports lack abundant demonstration , let people find out judgement or reason that change the original sentence to. In moving towards the historical process of the administration of the country according to law, what we need is the court verdict under a copy of sunshine, one has tight proving , exhaustive court verdict that argue, a court verdict with thorough legal principle , making quotations from various sources as proof and quote copiously. The judgement needs proving, need proving in order to form ＂law＂ of the judgement even more, ＂law＂ not proved lacks the exactness and acceptability. To proving the application of the theory, for reaching offering technical support of judgement conclusion in the judgement document, offer regulatory rule and method for the individual＇ s value judgement in the judgement conclusion forming process, build and have important meanings while constructing in the whole state policy.
出处
《政法论丛》
2005年第5期14-18,共5页
Journal of Political Science and Law
关键词
判决书
法律推理
论证
法律论证理论
court verdict
legal reasoning
demonstration
prove the theory in law
作者简介
张霞,女,法律硕士,山东省政法管理干部学院讲师,主要从事刑事法学研究.
