期刊文献+

缺血预适应对猪急性心肌梗死再灌注后无再流的影响 被引量:2

Beneficial Effects of Ischemic Preconditioning on Myocardial No-reflow in a Mini-swine Model of Acute Myocardial Infarction and Reperfusion
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价缺血预适应(IPC)防治猪急性心肌梗死(AMI)再灌注后无再流的作用。方法中华小型猪24只随机分成对照组、IPC组和假手术组,每组8只。冠状动脉结扎3h,松解1h制备AMI再灌注模型。AMI前、AMI后3h和再灌注1h后均行血流动力学测定,包括左室收缩压(LVSP)、左室舒张末压(LVEDP)、心排量(CO)和左心室内压最大收缩和舒张变化速率(±dp/dtmax)。各组使用电磁流量计于AMI前5min,对照组和IPC组于再灌注后即刻和1h时记录冠脉血流量,应用心肌声学造影(MCE)检查及病理学分析测定无再流范围(ANR)。结果与AMI前相比,对照和IPC两组AMI后3h和再灌注后1hLVSP、CO和±dp/dtmax均显著下降(P<0.05,P<0.01),LVEDP显著升高(P<0.01);对照组再灌注后1h仅LVSP比AMI后3h显著恢复(P<0.05),±dp/dtmax继续显著下降(P<0.05);IPC组再灌注后1hLVSP、LVEDP、±dp/dtmax和CO均比AMI3h显著恢复(P<0.05,P<0.01)。IPC组MCE和病理染色所测的冠脉结扎区心肌范围高度一致(P>0.05),再灌注后ANR分别为(16.4±2.24)%和(17.5±2.87)%,心肌坏死范围(NA)占LA的(78.4±3.62)%;IPC组结扎区心肌范围与对照组相比,差异无显著性(均P>0.05),但两方法所测ANR和NA均显著小于对照组(P<0.05,P<0.01)。对照和IPC两组再灌注即刻和再灌注后1h冠脉血流量明显低于AMI前(均P<0.01),IPC组再灌注即刻和再灌注后1h冠脉血流量均比对照组显著增加(P<0.05)。结论IPC能有效防治心肌梗死再灌注后无再流,改善心功能,缩小梗死面积。 Objective To evaluate the effects of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) on myocardial noreflow in a mini-swine model of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and reperfusion. Methods Twenty-four mini-swines were randomized into 3 study groups: 8 in control, 8 in IPC and 8 in sham-operated. Animals in the former two groups were subjected to 3 hours of coronary occlusion followed by 1 hour of reperfusion. Data on hemodynamics and coronary blood flow volume (CBV) were collected, and the area of no-reflow (ANR) was evaluated with both and pathological means. Necrosis area (NA) was staining. Results In control group, left ventricular of left ventricular pressure rise and fall (±dp/dtmax) 0.05, P〈 0.01), while left ventricular end-diastolic myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) in vivo measured with triphenyhetrazolium chloride (TTC) systolic pressure (LVSP), the maximum change rate and cardiac output (CO) significantly declined (P 〈 pressure (LVEDP) significantly increased at the endof 3 hours of left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion (both P 〈 0.01), with ±dp/dtmax, further significantly declined (both P 〈0.05) at 1 hour of reperfusion. In IPC group, LVSP, ±dp/dtmax, CO and LVEDP significantly recovered at 1 hour of reperfusion, compared with those in control group. In IPC group, the coronary ligation area was similar on both MCE in vivo and pathological evaluation (P 〉 0.05), and ANR was both also similarly as high as (16.4±2.24)% and (17.5±2.87)%, respectively, with final necrosis area (NA) reaching (78.4 ± 3.62)%. In IPC group, ANR and final NA were significantly lower than those in control group (P 〈 0.05, P 〈 0.01). In the control group, coronary blood flow volumn immediately after release of 3 hours occlusion and at 1 hour of reperfusion were significantly lower than the baseline (both P 〈 0.01). In IPC group, coronary blood flow volumn were significantly higher than those in the control group (both P 〈 0.01). Conclusion IPC is effective to area prevent myocardial no-reflow, improve left ventricular function and decrease infarct area.
出处 《中国医学科学院学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第4期486-490,i0001,共6页 Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae
关键词 缺血预适应 无再流 急性心肌梗死 心肌声学造影 ischemic preconditioning no-reflow acute myocardial infarction myocardial contrast echocardiography
作者简介 Corresponding author Tel: 010-88398080, Fax: 010-88390321, E-mail: YYJ@Fuwaihospital.org
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Ito H, Maruyama A, Iwakura K, et al. Clinical implications of the 'no-reflow' phenomenon: a predictor of complications and left ventricular remodeling in perfused anterior wall myocardial infarction. Circulation, 1996, 93(2):223-228.
  • 2Ito H, Tomooka T, Sakai N, et al. Lack of myocardial perfusion immediately after successful thrombolysis: a predictor of poor recovery of left ventricular function in anterior myocardial infarction. Circulation, 1992, 85(5):1699-1705.
  • 3Abbo KM, Dooris M, Glaziar S. Features and outcome of no-reflow after percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol, 1995, 75(12):778-782.
  • 4Morshima J. Angiographic no-reflow phenomenon as a predictor of adverse long-term outcome in patients treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for first acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2000, 36(4): 1202-1209.
  • 5Gersh BJ. Optimal management of aeute myocardial infarction at the down of the next millennium. Am Heart J,1999, 138(2 Pt2):188-202.
  • 6Eeckhout E, Kern MJ. The coronary no-reflow phenomenon:a review of mechenism and therapies. Eur Heart J, 2001,22(9):729-739.
  • 7Madonna M, Celani F, Funaro S, et al. Myocardial contrast echography history, methodology and clinical applications. Minerva Cardioangiol, 2003, 51(6):647-660.
  • 8Kloner RA, Ganote CE, Jennings RB. The no-reflow phenomenon after temporary coronary occlusion in the dog. J Clin Invest, 1974, 54(6):1498-1508.
  • 9Murry CE, Jennings RB, Reimer KA. Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium. Circulation, 1986, 74(5):1124-1136.
  • 10Yang XM, Baxter GF, Heads R J, et al. Infarct limitation of the second window of protection in a conscious rabbit model. Cardiovasc Res, 1996, 31(5):777-783.

同被引文献17

  • 1吴伟力,傅向华,马宁,李世强,谷新顺,薛玲,刘君,苗青,李亮.缺血预适应及侧支循环对缺血再灌注心肌的保护作用[J].中华心血管病杂志,2004,32(8):717-722. 被引量:19
  • 2胡允兆,卢剑华,吴焱贤,周艺,何宗云.急性心肌梗死中缺血预适应可否保护心肌[J].岭南心血管病杂志,2006,12(4):276-279. 被引量:1
  • 3Perez A,Ritter S,Brotschi B,et al.Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.J Pediatr,2013,163:454-459.
  • 4Xing B,Chen H,Zhang M,et al.Ischemic post-conditioning protects brain and reduces inflammation in a rat model of focal cerebral ischemia/reperfusion.J Neurochem,2008,105:1737-1745.
  • 5Ren C,Gao X,Niu G,et al.Delayed postconditioning protects against focal ischemic brain injury in rats.PLo S One,2008,3:e3851.
  • 6Zhao H,Sapolsky RM,Steinberg GK.Interrupting reperfusion as a stroke therapy:Ischemic postconditioning reduces infarct size after focal ischemia in rats.J Cereb Blood Flow Metab,2006,26:1114-1121.
  • 7Blomgren K,Hagberg H.Free radicals,mitochondria,and hypoxia-ischemia in the developing brain.Free Radic Biol Med,2006,40:388-397.
  • 8Gao X,Ren C,Zhao H.Protective effects of ischemic postconditioning compared with gradual reperfusion or preconditioning.J Neurosci Res,2008,86:2505-2511.
  • 9Wang JY,Shen J,Gao Q,et al.Ischemic postconditioning protects against global cerebral ischemia/reperfusion-induced injury in rats.Stroke,2008,39:983-990.
  • 10Zhao H,Ren C,Chen X,et al.From rapid to delayed and remote postconditioning:the evolving concept of ischemic postconditioning in brain ischemia.Curr Drug Targets,2012,13:173-187.

引证文献2

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部