摘要
洛克对天赋知识论进行了异常有力的批判。但是长期以来人们对这个批判的研究主要集中于洛克对天赋知识本身的分析和否定上,而这个批判的前提与内在矛盾尚未受到应有的重视,甚至没有成为西方哲学界关注的问题。这在相当程度上弱化了它在哲学史上应有的地位。洛克的批判所依据的两个基本前提是:"心中清楚分明的观念都为心灵所知觉"和"一事物不能同时既存在又不存在于心中"。它们是巴克莱和休谟推进经验主义的基本原则,但是它们也导致了英国经验主义自身的悖论。
Locke’s criticism of innatism is particularly fierce. For a long time, while studies have usually focused on Locke’s denial of innate knowledge, little attention has been paid to the premises and inner contradictions of this criticism, which in turn impaired the importance of the criticism in the history of philosophy. The two premises are: 'a clear and distinct idea in the mind must be perceived by it' and 'it is impossible for the same thing to be and not to be in the mind'. With the two premises Berkeley and Hume developed their empiricism but the premises also led British empiricism into a paradox.
出处
《山东大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第4期72-77,共6页
Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
