区域制度变迁与中国和东盟的政治合作被引量：1

ASEAN Regional Transition of Systems and Its Political Cooperation with China

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要 Since the end of the Cold War,the regional system of Southeast Asia has taken great changes with the result of the relations between China and the ASEAN being improved.With the rapid development of both sides in economy and trade,political cooperation came into a newphase with ASEAN-based regional organizations and multilateral dialogues.Nonetheless,on some key issues,both have not been able to reach consensus.This denotes the co-existence of positive and negative pattern of behavior in political interactions.Changes in the regional systems and the impact of their internal factors(especially their perceptions of security threats)affect the development of both sides.Therefore,neo-realism provides special interpretation for political cooperation. Since the end of the Cold War,the regional system of Southeast Asia has taken great changes with the result of the relations between China and the ASEAN being improved.With the rapid development of both sides in economy and trade,political cooperation came into a newphase with ASEAN-based regional organizations and multilateral dialogues.Nonetheless,on some key issues,both have not been able to reach consensus.This denotes the co-existence of positive and negative pattern of behavior in political interactions.Changes in the regional systems and the impact of their internal factors(especially their perceptions of security threats)affect the development of both sides.Therefore,neo-realism provides special interpretation for political cooperation.

作者马春海

机构地区山东省潍坊学院政史系

出处《东南亚纵横》 2005年第5期5-9,共5页 Crossroads：Southeast Asian Studies

关键词政治合作制度变迁东盟中国

分类号 F121 [经济管理—世界经济] D814.1 [政治法律—国际关系]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献15

1Barry Buzan, People, States and Fear: An agenda for international security studies in the post - Cold War era, 2nd ed. ( Boulder,Colorado, : Lyrme Rienner, 1991), P21 - 22.
2Mark Webber,States and Statehood, in Brian White, Richard Little and Michael Smith eds., Issues in World Politics( New York: St.Martin's, 1997), P24 - 44.
3Robert O. Keohane, " Theory of World Politics: Structural realism and beyond," in Robert O. Keohane,ed, Neorealism and Its Crisis ( New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), pp.158 - 203.
4Robert O. Keohane,"International Theory and the Realist Challenge After the Cold War," in David A. Baldwin, ed., Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The contemporary debate ( New York: Columbia University Press, 1993).
5Emanuel Adler, Beverly Crawford, and Jack Dommelly, eds, Progress in Postwar International Relations ( New York: Columbia University Press, 1991).
6James M. Goldgeier and Michael McFaul, "A Tale of Two Worlds: Core and Periphery in the Post - Cold War Ear,"International Organization, v. 46. n.2 (Spring 1992),P467 - 491.
7Harpajan Singh and Zarinah Daud, "Need to Preserve‘ ASEAN Way' ", cited in http ://www. jaring, my/- star/cur-rent/18hsaj.html , July 18, 1998.
8Sheldon W. Simon, "The Parallel Tracks of Asian Muhilaterlism," in Richard J. Ellings and Sheldon W. Simon,eds., Southeast Asia Security in the New Millennium (New York: M.E. Sharpe, 1996), P21.
9Amitaz Acharya, "ASEAN and Asia - Pacific Multilaterlism: Managing regional security," in Amitaz Acharya and Richard Stubbs, eds. New Challenges for ASEAN: Emerging policy issues (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 1995), P189- 194.
10Wu Xinbo, "China: Security practice of a modernizing and ascending power," in Muthiah Alagappa, ed. Asian Security Practice: Material and ideational influence (Stalaford,California: Stanford University Press, 1998) ,P115.