期刊文献+

NP和GP方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效比较 被引量:1

Efficacy Comparison of NP Regimen Versus GP Regimen in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]探讨吉西他滨联合顺铂方案(GP)及异长春花碱联合顺铂方案(NP)治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效及毒副反应。[方法]晚期非小细胞肺癌35例采用GP方案,38例采用NP方案,治疗2个周期后评价疗效及毒副反应。[结果]总有效率GP组为45.8%,NP组为52.6%;中位生存期分别为10.5和9.9个月,两组比较无显著性差异(P>0.05)。主要的毒副反应为血液毒性。[结论]GP和NP方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效肯定且相似,毒副反应可以耐受。 To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of vinorelbine combined with cisplatin(NP regimen) versus gemcitabine combined with cisplatin(GP regimen) in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer(NSCLC). Thirty-five cases with advanced NSCLC received GP regimen, and thirty-eight cases with advanced NSCLC received NP regimen. The efficacy and toxicity were evaluated after two cycles. The overall response rates of GP regimen group and NP regimen group were 45.8% and 52.6%, respectively, and the median survivals were 10.5 and 9.9 months, respectively. There was no significant difference between two groups in response rate and median survival. The major toxicity was hematological toxicity. [Conclusion] The GP and NP regimen for advanced NSCLC were both effective and their effects were similar. The toxicity was tolerable.
出处 《肿瘤学杂志》 CAS 2005年第1期13-15,共3页 Journal of Chinese Oncology
关键词 吉西他滨 异长春花碱 顺铂 非小细胞肺 gemcitabine navelbine cisplatin carcinoma, non-small-cell lung
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1American Society of Clinical Oncology. Clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: A phase Ⅱ study[J]. J Clin Oncol,1997,15(8):2996-3018.
  • 2Manegold C, Bergmann B, Chemaissani A, et al. Singleagent gemcitabine versus cisplatin-etoposide: Early results of a randomized phase Ⅱ study in locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer [J]. Ann Oncol,1997, 8(6):525-529.
  • 3Ricci S, Antonuzzo A, Galli L, et al. Gemcitabine as monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter phase Ⅲ study [J]. Lung Cancer, 2000, 27(2):75-80.
  • 4Van Moorsel CJ,Pinedo HM, Veerman G, et al. Mechanisms of synergism between cisplatin and gemcitabine in overian and non-small cell lung cancer cell lines[J]. Br J Cancer, 1999, 80(7):981-986.
  • 5Soto Parra HJ, Cavina R, Antonelli G, et al. Superiority of three week vs four week schedule of cisplatin(CDDP) and gemcitabine (GEM): Results of a randomized phase Ⅱ study[J]. Lung Cancer, 2000, 29(suppl 1):48-51.
  • 6侯梅,李慧,邱萌,李潞,鄢希.吉西他滨联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌临床研究[J].中国肺癌杂志,2001,4(3):191-193. 被引量:15
  • 7Scarliotti GV, De Marinis F, Rinaldi M, et al. Phase Ⅲ randomized trial comparing three platinum-based doublets in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol,2002, 20(21):4285-4291.
  • 8Chevalier TL, Brisgand D, Dourllard JYM, et al. Randomized study of vinorebline and cisplatin versus vindesine and cisplatin versus vinorebline alone in advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer:results of a European multicenter trial including 612 patients [J]. Clin Oncol, 1994,12(2):360-367.
  • 9孙志华,郑红敏,易铁男.国产长春瑞宾联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌36例分析[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2001,6(2):176-177. 被引量:5
  • 10蒋晖,范玉华,于丁.异长春花碱与顺铂联合治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌近期疗效观察[J].中国肺癌杂志,2003,6(5):388-389. 被引量:2

二级参考文献6

共引文献19

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部