期刊文献+

荣辱兴衰六十载——国外斯坦贝克研究综述 被引量:36

The Rise and Fall of Steinbeck's Critical Reputation Over the Past Sixty Years
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 斯坦贝克是一位始终没有得到充分的学术关怀的作家。几十年的斯坦贝克研究表明 ,批评家们往往采取简单化、极端化的态度对待其作品 ,这在很大程度上决定了斯坦贝克声誉的荣辱兴衰。 John Steinbeck is a writer who has never received sufficient academic attention. The existing research of Steinbeck demonstrates that critics often take simplified and one-sided attitudes towards his work. To a great extent, this has determined the rise and fall of Steinbeck's reputation.
作者 方杰
出处 《外国文学研究》 北大核心 2002年第3期152-157,共6页 Foreign Literature Studies
关键词 斯坦贝克 批评家 作家 兴衰 作品 学术 关怀 决定 Steinbeck Studies one-sidedness simplification
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Joseph R. McElrath et al, eds. John Steinbeck: The Contemporary Reviews, Cambridge University Press, 1996, p. 167, p. ⅹⅴ.
  • 2Warren French, ed. , A Companion to The Grapes of Wrath, New York: Viking, 1963, p. 109.
  • 3Edmund Wilson, The Boys in the Back Room: Notes on California Novelists, San Francisco: Colt Press, 1941, p. 42, p. 50.
  • 4Testumaro Hayashi, ed. , Steinbeck's Literary Dimension: A Guide to Comparative Studies, Scarecrow Press, 1973, p. 150.
  • 5Peter Lisca, The Wide World of John Steinbeck, Rutgers University Press, 1958, p. 294.
  • 6参见Joseph Fontenrose, John Steinbeck: An Introduction and Interpretation, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. , 1963, pp. 42—53.
  • 7David Wyatt, ed., New Essays on The Grapes of Wrath, Cambridge University Press, 1990, p. 7.
  • 8Richard Astro et al, ed. , John Steinbeck: The Man and His Work, Oregon State University Press, 1972, p. 2.
  • 9Joseph Blotner, The Modern American Political Novel: 1900—1960. Austin: The University of Texas Press, 1966, pp. 8—9.
  • 10Gordon Miln, The American Political Novel, Norman: The University of Oklahoma Press, 1966, p. 105.

同被引文献143

引证文献36

二级引证文献79

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部