摘要
目的比较RPR和TPPA两种检测方法在梅毒血清学试验中的价值。方法将一期梅毒、二期梅毒、潜伏梅毒及梅毒治愈后的患者的血清分别通过RPR和TPPA两种方法进行检测。结果潜伏期梅毒及梅毒治愈后患者的血清PRP和TPPA两种方法检测结果存在差异,且在RPR试验中出现2例前带现象。结论RPR和TPPA敏感性较一致,在不同阶段的特异性存在差异,RPR应作为初筛试验的检测方法,TPPA应用于确诊试验,且应注意在RPR检测过程中出现前带现象。
Objective: Compare the value of RPR and TPPA in the serologic test for syphilis. Methods: test the serum of primary syphilis, secondary syphilis, latent syphilis and cured syphilis through RPR and TPPA. Results: There exist difference between the results of latent syphilis and cued syphilis, two prozone phenomenon appear in the RPR test. Conclusions: There exist differences on the specificity of RPR and TPPA while there exist no differences on the specificity, RPR should be chosen as screening test and TPPA should be chosen as confirmative test, prozone phenomenon should be paid attention to during the test.
出处
《中国现代医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
2004年第23期111-112,共2页
China Journal of Modern Medicine
