期刊文献+

基于改进投票协议的群决策综合评判方法

Group Decision Comprehensive Evaluation Algorithm Based on Improved Voting Protocols
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究在群决策支持系统(GDSS)中对决策对象的综合评判问题。在分析现有方法局限性的基础上,提出一种基于改进的Bora投票协议的群决策综合评判方法,以实现agent对代理者偏好的提取。通过比较简便的方法收集决策者的评价意见,依照协议将定性的评价映射为数量评分。采用的投票协议可以避免建设性的操纵,克服了以往系统的主要缺陷,有效地实现了多人、多因素条件下的定性评价的量化和排序。 Comprehensive evaluation problem for decision objects is studied in group decision support systems (GDSS). Based on an analysis of limitations of existing methods, a new approach based on improved Bora voting protocol is proposed, by which the agent can get his preference elicitation. Opinions of decision-maker are collected in a simple way. The qualitative evaluation is translated to a quantitative grade and the constructive coalitional manipulation is avoided. It provides an effective comprehensive evaluation algorithm for scoring and ranking involving multi-user and multi-factors in the GDSS by qualitative evaluation and overcomes the drawbacks of existing systems.
出处 《北京理工大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第11期974-977,共4页 Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology
基金 国家部委预研项目(413150801)
关键词 群决策支持系统 Bora投票协议 综合评判 group decision support system Bora voting protocol comprehensive evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Bryson N. Aqualitative discriminant process for scoring and ranking in group support systems[J]. Information Processing & Management,1994,30(3):389-405.
  • 2Conitzer V, Sandholm T. Complexity of manipulating elections with fewcandidates[Z]. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), Edmonton, Canada,2002.
  • 3Conitzer V, Sandholm T. Complexity of mechanism design[Z]. 18th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI), Edmonton, Canada, 2002.
  • 4Sandholm T. Automated mechanism design: A new application area for search algorithms[Z]. International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP), Kinsale, Country Cork, Ireland, 2003.
  • 5Noam Nisan, Amir Ronen. Algorithmic mechanism design[J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 2001,35:166-1961.
  • 6Conitzer V, Sandholm T. VoteElicitation: Complexity and strategy-proofness[Z]. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), Edmonton, Canada, 2002.
  • 7Sandholm C V. How many candidates are needed to make elections hard to manipulate?[Z]. Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK), Bloomington, Indiana, 2003.
  • 8Sandholm T. Distributed rational decision making[A]. Multiagent systems: A Modern Introduction to Distributed Artificial Intelligence[C]. Cambridge, ma: MIT Press, 1999.201-258.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部