期刊文献+

表面钛涂层融合器应用于腰椎不稳症的初步报告 被引量:1

在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用解剖型表面钛涂层椎间融合器治疗腰椎不稳 12例 ,均行后路椎间融合术 (PLIF)植入两枚融合器 ,辅以后外侧植骨 ,不行椎间隙内融合器周围植骨 ,全部加用了椎弓根螺钉内固定。测量术前及末次随访的椎间隙及椎间孔高度、椎体间活动域 ,并进行对比 ,采用Oswestry功能障碍指数进行疗效评定。全部病例均获随访 4~ 15个月 (平均 9个月 )。结果均得到融合 ;术后椎间隙及椎间孔高度均得到满意恢复 ;疗效评定优良率为 91.6 %。结果表明 ,解剖型表面钛涂层椎间融合器应用于腰椎不稳的治疗是安全。
出处 《苏州大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 2004年第4期561-563,共3页 Suzhou University Journal of Medical Science
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Fairbank JCT, Pynsent PB.The Oswestry Disability Index[J].Spine, 2000, 25:2940-2953.
  • 2Muggleton JM, Kondracki M,Allen L.Spinal fusion for lumbar instability:does it have a scientific basis[J].Journal of Spinal Disorders,2000,13:200-204.
  • 3Dennis S, Watkins R, Landaker S, et al. Comparison of disc space hights after anterior lumbar interbody fusion[J]. Spine, 1989,14:876-878.
  • 4Bentler WJ, Walter C. Anterior lumbar fusion with paired BAK standard and paired BAK proximity cages: subsidence, subsidence factors and clinical outcome[J]. The Spine Journal,2003(S):289-293.
  • 5Burkus JK, Schuler TC, Gornet MF, et al. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion for the management ofchronic lower back pain: current strategies and concepts[J]. Orthop Clin N Am, 2004, 35:25-32.
  • 6Oki S, Matsuda Y, Shibata T, et al. Morphologic differences of the vascular buds in the vertebral endplate: Scanning electron microscopic study[J]. Spine, 1996, 21:174-177.
  • 7Thomas S,Anthony T,Max A.Effect of implant design and endplate preparation on the compressive strength of interbody fusion constructs[J].Spine,2000,25:1077-1084.
  • 8Lim TH, Kwon H,Jeon CH,et al.Effect of endplate conditions and bone mineral density on the compressive strength of the graft-endplate interface in anterior cervical spine fusion[J]. Spine, 2001,26:951-956.
  • 9Tropiano P, Diop A, Dejou J, et al. Interbody arthrodesis using a plasmapore titanium block. Mechanical and histological experimental study in sheep[J]. Chirurgie, 1999, 124:58-65.
  • 10杨惠林 唐天驷.腰椎不稳与腰椎管狭窄专题研讨会纪要[J].中华骨科杂志,1994,14(1):65-65.

共引文献240

同被引文献18

  • 1洪天禄,唐天驷,董天华.节段性不稳在脊椎滑脱症外科治疗中的临床意义[J].中华骨科杂志,1996,16(7):412-414. 被引量:86
  • 2Kaneda K,Satoh S,Nohara Y,et al.Distraction rod instrumentation with posterolateral fusion in isthmic spondylolisthesis.53 cases followed for 18-89 months Spine (Phila Pa 1976).1985;10(4):383-389.
  • 3Bridwell KH,Sedgewick TA,O'Brien MF,et al.The role of fusion and instrumentation in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis.J Spinal Disord.1993;6(6):461-472.
  • 4Herkowitz HN.Spine update.Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).1995;20(9):1084-1090.
  • 5Muggleton JM,Kondracki M,Allen R.Spinal fusion for lumbar instability:does it have a scientific basis? Spinal Disord.2000;13(3):200-204.
  • 6Lauber S,Schulte TL,Liljenqvist U,et al.Clinical and radiologic 2-4-year results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2006;31 (15):1693-1698.
  • 7Kim NH,Lee JW.Anterior interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion with transpedicular fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults.A comparison of clinical results.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).1999;24(8):812-816.
  • 8Harris BM,Hilibrand AS,Savas PE,et al.Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the fiexibility of the lumbar spine.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2004;29(4):E65-70.
  • 9Kim NH,Lee JW.Anterior interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion with transpedicular fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults.A comparison of clinical results.Spine(Phila Pa 1976).1999;24(8):812-816.
  • 10Ha KY,Na KH,Shin JH,et al.Comparison of posterolateral fusion with and without additional posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.J Spinal Disord Tech.2008;21 (4):229-234.

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部