期刊文献+

丙泊酚闭环靶控输注在腹腔镜子宫切除术镇静中的应用 被引量:2

Closed target-controlled infusion of propofol for sedation in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 评价脑电双频谱指数 (bispectralindex ,BIS)作为丙泊酚靶控输注的反馈控制变量用于硬膜外麻醉下腹腔镜子宫切除术病人镇静的效果。 方法  6 0例择期在硬膜外麻醉下行腹腔镜子宫切除术的病人 ,随机分为两组 :反馈靶控输注组 (FTCI,n =30 )和靶控输注组 (TCI,n =30 )。丙泊酚的血浆靶控浓度均设定为 2mg/L ,TCI组整个手术期维持不变 ,FTCI组BIS作为控制变量设定在 70。记录并比较两组BIS值、平均动脉压 (MAP)和心率 (HR)的最高值和最低值、丙泊酚的单位标准化剂量、定向力恢复时间、术中的遗忘程度和满意度。 结果 FTCI及TCI组BIS最高值分别为 76 1± 6 4、86 0± 8 6 ,最低值分别为 6 9 0± 4 5、6 0 9± 11 8,组间对比有统计学意义 (t =- 5 0 5 8,- 3 5 13;P =0 0 0 0 ) ;平均动脉压的最高值分别为 ( 90 9±14 2 )、( 10 0 4± 11 6 )mmHg ,最低值分别为 ( 74 2± 12 5 )、( 6 3 8± 13 8)mmHg,组间对比有统计学意义 (t=- 2 838,- 3 0 5 9;P=0 0 0 6 ,0 0 0 3) ;定向力恢复时间分别为 ( 4 40 .8± 14 1 0 )s、( 5 76 4± 12 0 5 )s ,两组也有统计学差异 (t=- 4 0 0 4 ,P =0 0 0 0 ) ;FTCI组丙泊酚总剂量明显低于TCI输注组 [分别为 ( 5 10 4 8± 82 75 )mg与 ( 6 2 0 Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of EEG bispectral index (BIS) as the feedback control variable of target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol for sedation in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy under epidural anesthesia. Methods A total of 60 patients for selective operation of laparoscopic hysterectomy under epidural anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups: the feedback TCI group (FTCI) and the TCI group (TCI),with 30 patients in each group.The target blood concentration of propofol was set up at a level of 2 mg/L.It was maintained unchanged in the TCI group throughout the surgery.The BIS value,as the control variable,was set up at 70 in the FTCI group.The highest and lowest BIS values,mean arterial pressure (MAP) and HR during the operation,the standardized unit dose of propofol,time for orientation recovery,the degree of amnesia during the operation and patient's satisfaction were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results Of the two groups: the maximum of BIS values were 76 1±6 4 and 86 0±8 6,respectively,with statistically significant difference ( t = -5 058, P =0 000),and the minimal values were 69 0±4 5 and 60 9±11 8,respectively,with significant difference ( t =-3 513, P =0 000); the highest MAPs were (90 9±14 2) mm Hg and (100 4±11 6) mm Hg,respectively,with significant difference ( t =-2 838, P =0 006),and the lowest,(74 2±12 5) mm Hg and (63 8±13 8) mm Hg,respectively,with statistical significance ( t =-3 059, P = 0 003); the time for orientation recovery was (440 8±141 0)s and (576 4±120 5)s,respectively,with significant difference ( t = -4 004, P =0 000).Total dose of propofol in the FTCI group [(510 48±82 75)mg] was statistically lower than that in the TCI group [(620 65±76 79)mg; t =-5 345, P =0 000],the same was the standardized unit dose of propofol [FTCI: (5 08±1 26)mg,TCI:(6 02±0 86)mg; t =-3 375, P =0 001].No significant differences were seen between the two groups in the degree of amnesia during the operation and patient's satisfaction. Conclusions BIS is feasible to be used as a feedback control variable in propofol anesthesia.It offers less propofol consumption,appropriate sedation,rapid recovery of orientation and more stable blood pressure.
出处 《中国微创外科杂志》 CSCD 2004年第4期337-338,340,共3页 Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
关键词 丙泊酚 靶控输注 脑电双频谱指数 腹腔镜子宫切除 Propofol Target-controlled infusion Bispectral index Laparoscopic hysterectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1[1]Marsh B,White M,Morton N,et al.Pharmacokinetic model driven infusion of propofol in children.Br J Anaesth,1991,67:41-48.
  • 2[2]Schttler J,Kloos S,Schwilden H,et al.Total intravenous anaesthsia with propofol and alfentanil by computer-assisted infusion.Anaesthesia,1988,43(Suppl):S2-S7.
  • 3[3]Kearse LA,Rosow C,Zaslavsky A,et al.Bispectrai anaiysis of electroencephalogram predicts conscious processing of information during propofol sedation and hypnosis.Anesthesioiogy,1998,88:25-34.
  • 4[4]Malinga M,Peitfaux F,Lepage JY,et al.Dose-response relationship between target-controlled concentration of propofol and bispectal index.Br J Anaesth,1998,80(Suppl):A132-A136.
  • 5[5]Doi M,Gajraj RJ,Mantzridis H,et al.Relationship between calculated blood concentration of propofol and electrophysiological variables during emerrnce fron anesthesia:comparison of bisectral index,spectral edge frequency and auditory evoked potential index.Br J Anaesth,1997,78:180-184.
  • 6[6]Karse LA,Manberg P,Chamoun N.Bispectral analysis of the electro-encephalogram correlates with patient movement to skin incision during propofol/nitrous oxideanestheia.Anethesiology,1994,81:1365-1369.
  • 7陈建颜,姚尚龙,曾邦雄.异丙酚靶控输注用于硬膜外麻醉病人清醒镇静的可行性[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2001,21(12):711-713. 被引量:57
  • 8[8]Glaser F,Scannwald GA,Buhr HJ,et al.General stress response to conventional and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Ann Surg,1995,221:372-375.
  • 9[9]Oei-Lim VL,White M,Kalkman CJ,et al.Pharmacokinetics of propofol during conscious sedation using target-controlled infusion in anxious patients undergoing dental treatment.Br J Anaesth,1998,80:324-331.

二级参考文献1

  • 1J. Fechner,S. Albrecht,H. Ihmsen,R. Knoll,H. Schwilden,J. Schüttler. Pr?diktivit?t und Pr?zision einer ?target-controlled infusion” (TCI) von Propofol mit dem System ?Disoprifusor TCI?”[J] 1998,Der Anaesthesist(8):663~668

共引文献56

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部