期刊文献+

社会建构主义述评 被引量:7

From "Historicism" to "Constructivism"
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 20世纪80年代后,知识社会学实践了科学的"理性重建"向"社会建构"的转向,使科学研究(ScienceStudies)从理论转向科学实践,打开了一个至今被忽视了的一系列新问题的大门。这种转向与库恩的历史主义的范式理论存在着密切的联系。这种联系体现在:科学被视为一个"传统权威范式"、一种工匠默会知识和手艺活动、一种范式的政治利益代表,它把科学视为与人类的其它文化活动等价。但由于强纲领知识社会学否定了自然在认识中的基础地位,只强调社会因素的意义,从而导致了对科学与理性的全面解构。 From 1980, Sociology of Scientific Knowledge has realized the turning from rational reconstruction of science into sociological reconstruction of science. As a result, it opens a door of a series of new problems, which have been neglected. Of course, this sociological turn has a close relation to the Kuhn's historicism paradigm theory. However, because the 'strong' in 'strong program' SSK means that in understanding nature, there is no role of nature, and social factors play only a key role, and it thus lead a complete deconstruction to science and reason.
作者 蔡仲
机构地区 南京大学哲学系
出处 《淮阴师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2004年第4期424-427,共4页 Journal of Huaiyin Teachers College(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 历史主义 社会建构 强纲领SSK historicism constructivism 'strong program'SSK
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1[1]Barnes, Barry. Interests and the Growth of Knowledge[M]. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul,1977.23.
  • 2[2]佐佐木力.托马斯· 库恩与科学观的转向[EB/OL].http://www.phil.pku.edu.cn/post/show.php?op=pap&sid=35.
  • 3[5]Barry Banes. T. S. Kuhn and Social Science[M]. London: Macmillan,1982.89.
  • 4霍尔顿.科学与反科学[M].南昌:江西教育出版社,1999.192.
  • 5[7]Fuller, Steve. Science Studies Through the Looking Glass[J]. In Beyond The Science Wars, Edited by Ullica Segerstrale.Albany:State University of New York Press, 2000. 199.
  • 6[8]Ian Golinski. Making natural Knowledge: Constructivism and the History of Science[M]. Cambridge University Press, 1998.23.
  • 7[9]Pickering, Andrew. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency & Science[M].Chicago: University of Chicago Press,1995. 10.

共引文献1

同被引文献136

引证文献7

二级引证文献194

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部