期刊文献+

Laparoscopic vs open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer:A meta-analysis 被引量:14

Laparoscopic vs open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer:A meta-analysis
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM:To conduct a meta-analysis comparing laparoscopic total gastrectomy(LTG)with open total gastrectomy(OTG)for the treatment of gastric cancer.METHODS:Major databases such as Medline(PubMed),Embase,Academic Search Premier(EBSCO),Science Citation Index Expanded and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials(CENTRAL)in The Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing LTG and OTG from January 1994 to May 2013.Evaluated endpoints were operative,postoperative and oncological outcomes.Operative outcomes included operative time and intraoperative blood loss.Postoperative recovery included time to first fatus,time to first oral intake,hospital stay and analgesics use.Postoperative complications comprised morbidity,anastomotic leakage,anastomotic stenosis,ileus,bleeding,abdominal abscess,wound problems and mortality.Oncological outcomes included positive resection margins,number of retrieved lymph nodes,and proximal and distal resection margins.The pooled effect was calculated using either a fixed effects or a random effects model.RESULTS:Fifteen non-randomized comparative studies with 2022 patients were included(LTG-811,OTG-1211).Both groups had similar short-term oncological outcomes,analgesic use(WMD-0.09;95%CI:-2.39-2.20;P=0.94)and mortality(OR=0.74;95%CI:0.24-2.31;P=0.61).However,LTG was associated with a lower intraoperative blood loss(WMD-201.19 mL;95%CI:-296.50--105.87 mL;P<0.0001)and overall complication rate(OR=0.73;95%CI:0.57-0.92;P=0.009);fewer wound-related complications(OR=0.39;95%CI:0.21-0.72;P=0.002);a quicker recovery of gastrointestinal motility with shorter time to frst fatus(WMD-0.82;95%CI:-1.18--0.45;P<0.0001)and oral intake(WMD-1.30;95%CI:-1.84--0.75;P<0.00001);and a shorter hospital stay(WMD-3.55;95%CI:-5.13--1.96;P<0.0001),albeit with a longer operation time(WMD 48.25 min;95%CI:31.15-65.35;P<0.00001),as compared with OTG.CONCLUSION:LTG is safe and effective,and may offer some advantages over OTG in the treatment of gastric cancer. AIM: To conduct a meta-analysis comparing laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) with open total gastrectomy (OTG) for the treatment of gastric cancer. METHODS: Major databases such as Medline (PubMed), Embase, Academic Search Premier (EBSCO), Science Citation Index Expanded and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing LTG and OTG from January 1994 to May 2013. Evaluated endpoints were operative, postoperative and oncological outcomes. Operative outcomes included operative time and intraoperative blood loss. Postoperative recovery included time to first ?atus, time to first oral intake, hospital stay and analgesics use. Postoperative complications comprised morbidity, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stenosis, ileus, bleeding, abdominal abscess, wound problems and mortality. Oncological outcomes included positive resection margins, number of retrieved lymph nodes, and proximal and distal resection margins. The pooled effect was calculated using either a fixed effects or a random effects model. RESULTS: Fifteen non-randomized comparative studies with 2022 patients were included (LTG - 811, OTG - 1211). Both groups had similar short-term oncological outcomes, analgesic use (WMD -0.09; 95%CI: -2.39-2.20; P = 0.94) and mortality (OR = 0.74; 95%CI: 0.24-2.31; P = 0.61). However, LTG was associated with a lower intraoperative blood loss (WMD -201.19 mL; 95%CI: -296.50--105.87 mL; P < 0.0001) and overall complication rate (OR = 0.73; 95%CI: 0.57-0.92; P = 0.009); fewer wound-related complications (OR = 0.39; 95%CI: 0.21-0.72; P = 0.002); a quicker recovery of gastrointestinal motility with shorter time to ?rst ?atus (WMD -0.82; 95%CI: -1.18--0.45; P < 0.0001) and oral intake (WMD -1.30; 95%CI: -1.84--0.75; P < 0.00001); and a shorter hospital stay (WMD -3.55; 95%CI: -5.13--1.96; P < 0.0001), albeit with a longer operation time (WMD 48.25 min; 95%CI: 31.15-65.35; P < 0.00001), as compared with OTG. CONCLUSION: LTG is safe and effective, and may offer some advantages over OTG in the treatment of gastric cancer.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2013年第44期8114-8132,共19页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
基金 Supported by UK/China Postgraduate Scholarships for Excellence,an NIHR Translational Research Fellowship and a Royal College of Surgeons of England-Ethicon Research Fellowship grant
关键词 GASTRIC cancer LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL GASTRECTOMY LAPAROSCOPIC assisted TOTAL GASTRECTOMY OPEN TOTAL GASTRECTOMY META-ANALYSIS Gastric cancer Laparoscopic total gastrectomy Laparoscopic assisted total gastrectomy Open total gastrectomy Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献42

  • 1Moon-Soo Lee,Ju-Hee Lee,Do Joong Park,Hyuk-Joon Lee,Hyung-Ho Kim,Han-Kwang Yang.Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy and open total gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients[J]. Surgical Endoscopy . 2013 (7)
  • 2Oh Jeong,Mi Ran Jung,Gwang Yong Kim,Han Soo Kim,Seong Yeop Ryu,Young Kyu Park.Comparison of Short-Term Surgical Outcomes Between Laparoscopic and Open Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma: Case-Control Study Using Propensity Score Matching Method[J]. Journal of the American College of Surgeons . 2013
  • 3Guoxian Guan,Weizhong Jiang,Zhifen Chen,Xing Liu,Huishan Lu,Xiangfu Zhang.Early results of a modified splenic hilar lymphadenectomy in laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy for gastric cancer with stage cT1-2: a case–control study[J]. Surgical Endoscopy . 2013 (6)
  • 4Bang Wool Eom,Young-Woo Kim,Sang Eok Lee,Keun Won Ryu,Jun Ho Lee,Hong Man Yoon,Soo-Jeong Cho,Myeong-Cherl Kook,Soo Jin Kim.Survival and surgical outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: case–control study[J]. Surgical Endoscopy . 2012 (11)
  • 5Eduardo F. Vi?uela,Mithat Gonen,Murray F. Brennan,Daniel G. Coit,Vivian E. Strong.Laparoscopic Versus Open Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and High-Quality Nonrandomized Studies[J]. Annals of Surgery . 2012 (3)
  • 6Chikara Kunisaki,Hirochika Makino,Takashi Kosaka,Takashi Oshima,Shoichi Fujii,Ryo Takagawa,Jun Kimura,Hidetaka A. Ono,Hirotoshi Akiyama,Masataka Taguri,Satoshi Morita,Itaru Endo.Surgical outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a case-control study[J]. Surgical Endoscopy . 2012 (3)
  • 7Andreas Stang.Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses[J]. European Journal of Epidemiology . 2010 (9)
  • 8Kazuki Inaba,Seiji Satoh,Yoshinori Ishida,Keizo Taniguchi,Jun Isogaki,Seiichiro Kanaya,Ichiro Uyama.Overlap Method: Novel Intracorporeal Esophagojejunostomy after Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy[J]. Journal of the American College of Surgeons . 2010 (6)
  • 9Hyung-Ho Kim,Woo Jin Hyung,Gyu Seok Cho,Min Chan Kim,Sang-Uk Han,Wook Kim,Seung-Wan Ryu,Hyuk-Joon Lee,Kyo Young Song.Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: An Interim Report—A Phase III Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Trial (KLASS Trial)[J]. Annals of Surgery . 2010 (3)
  • 10Hideki Kawamura,Ryoichi Yokota,Shigenori Homma,Yukifumi Kondo.Comparison of respiratory function recovery in the early phase after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy and open gastrectomy[J]. Surgical Endoscopy . 2010 (11)

同被引文献166

引证文献14

二级引证文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部