期刊文献+

Ⅰa1期宫颈癌宫颈锥切术术后病灶残余状况及其危险因素分析 被引量:3

Analysis of Postoperative Residual Lesions Status and Risk Factors of Cervical Conization for StageⅠa1 Cervical Carcinoma
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨宫颈锥切术治疗Ⅰa1期宫颈癌患者术后病灶残余状况及其危险因素。方法选择接受宫颈锥切术治疗的30例Ⅰa1期宫颈癌患者作为研究对象,同期接受广泛或次广泛全子宫切除术的20例Ⅰa1期宫颈癌患者作为对照组,观察并分析术后病灶残余状况及其危险因素。结果锥切组宫旁浸润比例与对照组的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。切缘阳性患者的病变残留率明显高于切缘阴性患者(P<0.05);高危HPV感染患者的病变残留率明显高于高危HPV阴性患者(P<0.05);经Logistic多因素回归分析,切缘情况、是否高危HPV感染是直接影响术后病灶残留的因素。结论宫颈锥切术治疗Ⅰa1期宫颈癌患者,术后病灶残余风险较高,手术方式应根据高危因素进行合理选择。 Objective To investigate the postoperative residual lesions status and risk factors of cervical conization for stageⅠa1 cervical carcinoma .Methods 30 cases of stageⅠa1 cervical carcinoma patients treated with cervical conization were selected as the study group ,20 cases of stageⅠa1 cervical carcinoma patients treated with wide or sub-extensive hysterectomy were selected as the control group ,postoperative residual lesions status and risk factors were observed .Results The proportion of parametrial invasion between the study group and the control group had statistical differences (P<0.05):Residual disease rate of margin-positive patients were significantly higher than that of margin-negative patients(P<0.05):Residual disease rate of HPV-positive patients were significantly higher than that of HPV-negative patients(P<0.05).Logistic multi-factors regression analysis showed that margin status ,HPV infection is direct factor affecting postoperative residual lesions .Conclusion Cervical conization for stageⅠa1 cervical carcinoma has high risk of postoperative residual lesions ,surgical approach should be selected according to risk factors.
出处 《实用癌症杂志》 2014年第2期208-210,共3页 The Practical Journal of Cancer
关键词 锥形切除术 宫颈癌 危险因素 Conization Cervical carcinoma Risk factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献50

  • 1吕卫国,沈源明,叶枫,陈怀增,谢幸.阴道镜直视下活检诊断宫颈上皮内瘤变准确性的评价[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(5):303-306. 被引量:107
  • 2楼卓鑫,张天厚,贺晶.宫颈机能不全47例分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2006,22(3):179-180. 被引量:31
  • 3Wright TC Jr,Massad LS,Dunton CJ,et al.2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or adenocarcinoma in situ.Am J Obstet Gynecol,2007,197(4):340-345.
  • 4Ghaem-Maghami S,Sagi S,Majeed G,et al.Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of treatment failure:a meta-analysis.Lancet Oncol,2007,8(11):985-993.
  • 5Bruinsma F,Lumley J,Tan J,et al.Precancerous changes in the cervix and risk of subsequent preterm birth.BJOG,2007,114(1):70-80.
  • 6Barvara C,Moore M,Robert V,et al.Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy.Am J Obstet Gynecol,1995,173(2):361-368.
  • 7Wright YC Jr,Cox JT,Massad LS,et al.2001 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.Am J Obstet Gynecol,2003,189(1):295-304.
  • 8White CD.Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia extending to the margins of resection in conization of the cervix.J Reprod Med,1991,36 (9):635-638.
  • 9Salani R,Ren I,Bristow RE,et al.Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix:a meta analysis of 1278 patients evaluating the predictive value of conization margin status.Am J Obstet Gynecol,2009,200(2):182e1-e5.
  • 10Lapaquette TK,Dinh TV,Hannigan EV,et al.Management of patients with positive margins after cervical conization.Obstet Gynecol,1993,82(3):440-443.

共引文献79

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部