期刊文献+

Withdrawal time in excellent or very poor bowel preparation qualities 被引量:4

Withdrawal time in excellent or very poor bowel preparation qualities
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To evaluate association(s) between withdrawal time and polyp detection in various bowel preparation qualities. METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of screening colonoscopies performed between January 2005 and June 2011 for patients with average risk of colorectal cancer. Exclusion criteria included patients with a personal history of adenomatous polyps or colon cancer, prior colonic resection, significant family history of colorectal cancer, screening colonoscopy after other abnormal screening tests such as flexible sigmoidoscopy or barium enema, and screening colonoscopies during in-patient care. All procedures were performed or directly supervised by gastroenterologists. Main measurements were number of colonic segments with polyps and total number of colonic polyps.RESULTS: Multivariate analysis of 8331 colonosco-pies showed longer withdrawal time was associated with more colonic segments with polyps in good(adjusted OR = 1.16; 95%CI: 1.13-1.19), fair(OR = 1.13; 95%CI: 1.10-1.17), and poor(OR = 1.18; 95%CI: 1.11-1.26) bowel preparation qualities. A higher number of total polyps was associated with longer withdrawal time in good(OR = 1.15; 95%CI: 1.13-1.18), fair(OR = 1.13; 95%CI: 1.10-1.16), and poor(OR = 1.20; 95%CI: 1.13-1.29) bowel preparation qualities. Longer withdrawal time was not associated with more colonic segments with polyps or greater number of colonic polyps in bowel preparations with excellent(OR = 1.07, 95%CI: 0.99-1.26; OR = 1.11, 95%CI: 0.99-1.24, respectively) and very poor(OR = 1.02, 95%CI: 0.99-1.12; OR = 1.05, 95%CI: 0.99-1.10, respectively) qualities.CONCLUSION: Longer withdrawal time is not associated with higher polyp number detected in colonoscopies with excellent or very poor bowel preparation quality. AIM: To evaluate association(s) between withdrawal time and polyp detection in various bowel preparation qualities. METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of screening colonoscopies performed between January 2005 and June 2011 for patients with average risk of colorectal cancer. Exclusion criteria included patients with a personal history of adenomatous polyps or colon cancer, prior colonic resection, significant family history of colorectal cancer, screening colonoscopy after other abnormal screening tests such as flexible sigmoidoscopy or barium enema, and screening colonoscopies during in-patient care. All procedures were performed or directly supervised by gastroenterologists. Main measurements were number of colonic segments with polyps and total number of colonic polyps.RESULTS: Multivariate analysis of 8331 colonosco-pies showed longer withdrawal time was associated with more colonic segments with polyps in good(adjusted OR = 1.16; 95%CI: 1.13-1.19), fair(OR = 1.13; 95%CI: 1.10-1.17), and poor(OR = 1.18; 95%CI: 1.11-1.26) bowel preparation qualities. A higher number of total polyps was associated with longer withdrawal time in good(OR = 1.15; 95%CI: 1.13-1.18), fair(OR = 1.13; 95%CI: 1.10-1.16), and poor(OR = 1.20; 95%CI: 1.13-1.29) bowel preparation qualities. Longer withdrawal time was not associated with more colonic segments with polyps or greater number of colonic polyps in bowel preparations with excellent(OR = 1.07, 95%CI: 0.99-1.26; OR = 1.11, 95%CI: 0.99-1.24, respectively) and very poor(OR = 1.02, 95%CI: 0.99-1.12; OR = 1.05, 95%CI: 0.99-1.10, respectively) qualities.CONCLUSION: Longer withdrawal time is not associated with higher polyp number detected in colonoscopies with excellent or very poor bowel preparation quality.
出处 《World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy》 CAS 2014年第5期186-192,共7页 世界胃肠内镜杂志(英文版)(电子版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Prashant Sharma,John Frye,Frank Frizelle.Accuracy of visual prediction of pathology of colorectal polyps: how accurate are we?[J].ANZ J Surg.2014(5)
  • 2V. Moritz,M. Bretthauer,H. Ruud,T. Glomsaker,T. de Lange,P. Sandvei,G. Huppertz-Hauss,?. Kjellevold,G. Hoff.Withdrawal time as a quality indicator for colonoscopy - a nationwide analysis[J].Endoscopy.2012(05)
  • 3Andrew Taber,Joseph Romagnuolo.Effect of simply recording colonoscopy withdrawal time on polyp and adenoma detection rates[J].Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2010(4)
  • 4Edwin J. Lai,Audrey H. Calderwood,Gheorghe Doros,Oren K. Fix,Brian C. Jacobson.The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research[J].Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2009(3)
  • 5Mandeep S. Sawhney,Marcelo S. Cury,Naama Neeman,Long H. Ngo,Janet M. Lewis,Ram Chuttani,Douglas K. Pleskow,Mark D. Aronson.Effect of Institution-Wide Policy of Colonoscopy Withdrawal Time ≥7 Minutes on Polyp Detection[J].Gastroenterology.2008(6)
  • 6J.K. Harris,F. Froehlich,V. Wietlisbach,B. Burnand,J.-J. Gonvers,J.-P. Vader.Factors associated with the technical performance of colonoscopy: An EPAGE Study[J].Digestive and Liver Disease.2007(7)
  • 7D. T.SIMMONS,G. C.HAREWOOD,T. H.BARON,B. T.PETERSEN,K. K.WANG,F.BOYD‐ENDERS,B. J.OTT.Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time[J].Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics.2006(6)
  • 8Douglas K. Rex,John L. Petrini,Todd H. Baron,Amitabh Chak,Jonathan Cohen,Stephen E. Deal,Brenda Hoffman,Brian C. Jacobson,Klaus Mergener,Bret T. Petersen,Michael A. Safdi,Douglas O. Faigel,Irving M. Pike.Quality indicators for colonoscopy[J].Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2006(4)
  • 9Gavin C. Harewood,Virender K. Sharma,Pat de Garmo.Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia[J].Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2003(1)
  • 10Reid M Ness,Raj Manam,Helena Hoen,Naga Chalasani.Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy[J].The American Journal of Gastroenterology.2001(6)

同被引文献31

引证文献4

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部