摘要
"华盛顿共识"主张的是政府的角色最小化、快速的私有化和自由化,对于"华盛顿共识"的反思和批评导致了"后华盛顿共识"的出现。"后华盛顿共识"呼吁超越"华盛顿共识",将发展的目标定得更加广泛和长远,并且让政府在经济成长过程中起更加积极的作用。"北京共识"是对中国渐进式转轨经验的一种总结,这样的总结不一定全面,也很难是全面的,但可以促进对中国模式的关注和研究。
The Washington consensus appeals to a minimized role of government,a fast process of privatization and liberalization,which was criticized and corrected by post Washington consensus.The post Washington consensus argues to transcend the Washington consensus by setting a longterm goal with more abroad aims and making the role of government more active in the process of economic,development.The Beijing consensus tries to summarize the experience of China's gradual transition.Even it is hard to grasp the whole nature of China's reform,the Beijing consensus has made contribution to the research of the Chinese model.
出处
《政治经济学评论》
2006年第2期34-53,共20页
China Review of Political Economy
