摘要
《关于办理死刑案件审查判断证据若干问题的规定》中,针对各类证据设置了若干证据客观性保障规则,也即排除不具备证据客观性保障条件的证据的规则。我国的证据客观性保障规则与美国的鉴真制度在规则特征、制度特征、规范目的等方面均有区别。这些规则的出现,为重新审视我国证据法学界关于证据的"三性"理论提供了一种新契机,同时扩展了证据排除规则的范围。我国的证据客观性保障规则具有以法官审查判断证据为中心、规则的形式化特征较强、对言词证据的取证设置了较严的客观性保障条件等特点。为使证据客观性保障规则在实践中充分发挥作用,应对规则的实施进行诉讼化改革,完善证明机制,同时加强规则自身的科学性及灵活性。
In The Rules about Judging Evidence in Capital Cases,there are some guarantee rules of evidence objectivity about all kinds of evidences.Those rules are different from authentication of America in the characteristic of rules,characteristic of mechanism and the objective of rules.Those rules offer an opportunity to review China's traditional theory of three properties of the evidence,and at the same time,expand the range of exclusionary rule.The rules are centered on the Evidence Judging process of the Judges.Those rules have strong characteristic of formalization,and set up strict procedure to verbal evidence.To implement those rules,proof mechanism should be perfected,and the scientificalness and flexibility of those rules should be strengthened.
出处
《山东大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第4期76-86,共11页
Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词
证据客观性保障规则
客观性保障条件
证据排除
guarantee rules of evidence objectivity
guarantee condition of evidence objectivity
exclusionary rule
