摘要
目前出版的各种文学史几乎都把《左传·襄公二十九年》记载的季札聘鲁观乐之事作为"孔子删诗说"的反证,并据此推定《诗经》编辑的年代。对这一观点提出质疑的是朱东润先生。但迄今为止,朱先生的质疑并未引起学术界足够的重视。有鉴于此,文章拟对朱先生的观点作进一步的补说。主要阐明以下几个观点:季札所见国风的顺序不可信;季札评《诗经》是孔子评《关雎》的翻版;"季札观乐"是杜撰的"史实"。
At present all kinds of published histories of Chinese literature almost took the story of Jizha’s Observation of Lu Country Music(Jizha visited Lu State observing music),which was recorded in The Book of Zuozhuan,as the counterevidence of the doctrine of Confucius’deleting The Book of Poetry.Moreover,the year of The Book of Poetry compiled in history was inferred by the doctrine.It was Mr.Zhu Dongrun who queried the doctrine.But so far,Mr.Zhu’s viewpoint caused insufficient attention in academic circles.In view of such facts,the paper makes further supplements for Mr.Zhu’s viewpoint by expounding the following major views:the sequence of Guo Feng seen by Jizha was incredible;Jizha’s comment on The Book of Poetry was the refurbished version of Confucius’comment on Guanju,and Jizha’s Observation of Lu State Music was fabricated historical facts.
出处
《大连理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2013年第3期98-102,共5页
Journal of Dalian University of Technology(Social Sciences)
基金
教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目:"比较诗学的东亚生成"(10YJC751038)
关键词
孔子删诗
季札
《诗经》
《左传》
Confucius deleting the'Book of Poetry'
Jizha
Book of Poetry
Zuozhuan
