期刊文献+

笑气吸入与电针刺激在无痛分娩中的临床对比观察 被引量:4

A compare study on the clinical efect of ease pain using transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation(TEAS)with Nitrous oxide(N_2O)inhalation during indolence delivery
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察笑气吸入与电针刺激在无痛分娩中的临床效果。方法:将我院2004年7月~2009年6月间的180例产妇随机分为3组:电针刺激组、笑气(氧化亚氮)吸入组及空白对照组,每组各60例。分娩中观察产妇的感觉、情绪、心率、血压等指标,镇痛效果评估参考Mulleetr评分法,新生儿窒息诊断标准采用Apgar评分法,资料结果用t检验分析处理。结果:电针刺激组和笑气组与对照组分别比较,均明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),电针刺激组与笑气组相比,笑气组又明显优于电针刺激组,差别亦有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:电针刺激与笑气吸入对缓解产妇的分娩产痛均有显著镇痛效果,同时可以改善母体和胎儿的氧供平衡,对母子均益处良多,是安全、有效、可靠、简便的分娩镇痛方法,且笑气吸入效果更佳。 Objective:To study the clinical effect of ease pain using transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation(TEAS)comparing with Nitrous oxide(N2O)inhalation during indolence delivery.Methods:180 lying-in women were randomly assigned into three groups:TEAS group,N2O inhalation and a control with 60 cases of each during Jul.2004 to Jun.2006 in our hospita1.Feeling,sense,heart beating and blood pressure were observed and the effect of ease pain was evaluated by Mulleetr s method.Apgar criterion was used for the n...
机构地区 淄博市中医医院
出处 《针灸临床杂志》 2010年第4期23-25,共3页 Journal of Clinical Acupuncture and Moxibustion
关键词 笑气 电针刺激 无痛分娩 镇痛 Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation Nitrous oxide(N2O)inhalation Indolence delivery Ease pain Delivery furthermore
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献35

  • 1崔东辰,耿军.择期性手术病人的心理应激及护理对策[J].中华护理杂志,1996,31(12):692-695. 被引量:445
  • 2临床麻醉学编写组.临床麻醉学[M].天津:天津科学技术出版社,1992.80.
  • 3张曦主编.无痛计划分娩[M].合肥:安徽科学技术出版社,1995.37.
  • 4郭凤琳,张家驹.ICU 综合征及音乐疗法[J].国外医学(护理学分册),1997,16(3):103-104. 被引量:228
  • 5Alexander JM. The course of labor with and without epidural analgesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol,1998,178(3) :516.
  • 6Bengtsson J, Worning AM, Gertz J, et al. Pain due to ureterolithiasis treated by intracutaneous injection of sterile water ugeskr. Laeger,1981,143(10) :3463.
  • 7刘俊杰,现代麻醉学(第2版),1997年,225,272页
  • 8临床麻醉学编写组,临床麻醉学,1992年,80页
  • 9Patnicl PW, Ronald W. Textkook of PAIN [M]. New Yonk:Chruchill Liuinytone, 1985: 196 - 197.
  • 10Wilson M J, Cooper G, Mac Arthur C, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing traditional with two ~'mobile" epidural techniques:anesthetic and analgesic efficacy. Anesthesiology, 2002,97 (6):1567-1575.

共引文献327

同被引文献27

引证文献4

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部