期刊文献+

Percutaneous coronary interventions in the elderly:a 10-year experience in Northern New England 被引量:1

Percutaneous coronary interventions in the elderly:a 10-year experience in Northern New England
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 Background There is a paucity of information available for clinical decision making applying to the elderly patient population. Therefore, data of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) including demographic information on the elderly patients, procedural practices, and outcomes are needed. Objectives and Methods From consecutive PCIs of participating institutions, demographics data, clinical, angiographic success and adverse clinical outcomes were collected. Standard statistical methods were used to compare crude differences in patient and procedural characteristics across age groups. Results At baseline, the prevalence of comorbid conditions ( renal failure and heart failure) increased with age. Unstable angina or a non-ST elevation MI were the most common indications for PCI across all age groups. Fewer patients ≥ 80 years old were undergoing primary PCI and older patients were somewhat less likely to receive a Ⅱb/Ⅲa receptor blocker. Slightly more patients ≥ 80 years old underwent a 2-vessel PCI ( consistent with them having more multivessel disease) and these patients were more likely to have an intervention on a Type C lesion. Compared to patients < 50 years old, those aged ≥ 70 years old had a significantly increased risk of death, MI, stroke, or vascular complications at the access site. Conclusions This study suggests increasing age is associated with increasing risk for an adverse outcome following PCI. This is in part attributable to case-mix but likely, also related to the changing physiology of aging. Despite the increased risk of the procedure, the clinical success rate for PCI is quite high and makes it a reasonable alternative for the treatment of CAD in the elderly. Background There is a paucity of information available for clinical decision making applying to the elderly patient population. Therefore, data of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) including demographic information on the elderly patients, procedural practices, and outcomes are needed. Objectives and Methods From consecutive PCIs of participating institutions, demographics data, clinical, angiographic success and adverse clinical outcomes were collected. Standard statistical methods were used to compare crude differences in patient and procedural characteristics across age groups. Results At baseline, the prevalence of comorbid conditions ( renal failure and heart failure) increased with age . Unstable angina or a non-ST elevation MI were the most common indications for PCI across all age groups . Fewer patients≥80 years old were undergoing primary PCI and older patients were somewhat less likely to receive aⅡb/Ⅲa receptor blacker. Slightly more patients≥80 years old underwent a 2-vessel PCI ( consistent with them having more multivessel disease ) and these patients were more likely to have an intervention on a Type C lesion. Compared to patients < 50 years old, those aged≥70 years old had a significantly increased risk of death, MI, stroke, or vascular complications at the access site . Conclusions This study suggests increasing age is associated with increasing risk for an adverse outcome following PCI. This is in part attributable to case-mix but likely, also related to the changing physiology of aging. Despite the increased risk of the procedure, the clinical success rate for PCI is quite high and makes it a reasonable alternative for the treatment of CAD in the elderly. (J Geriatr Cardiol2005;2(1) :17-22).
出处 《Journal of Geriatric Cardiology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2005年第1期17-22,共6页 老年心脏病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 CORONARY ARTERY disease ELDERLY PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION coronary artery disease elderly percutaneous coronary intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1Joachim Boldt,Günther Haisch,Bernhard Kumle,Christian Brosch,Andreas Lehmann,Christiane Werling.Does coagulation differ between elderly and younger patients undergoing cardiac surgery?[J].Intensive Care Medicine.2002(4)

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部