摘要
英国法中的document of title并非大陆法系中的物权证券,其意指提单是其上所载货物的表征。英国法承认提单document of title功能的依据为商业习惯,而商业活动只是需要一份代表货物流转的单证。在我国法制下解释提单的物权功能应本着功能性比较的原则,即不执着于寻找document of title的对应物,而是探究英国法中提单的document of title功能在我国法中如何完成,我国法对之作如何解释。我国法要求动产以交付作为物权变动的成立要件,故必须承认交付提单与交付货物具有同一效力,是为提单的物权效力。提单转让所处的法律关系有别,故持有人取得的权利不同,物权凭证说在此面临尴尬,物权效力理论则可揭示其原因。
The B/L as a document of title under the British law does not belong to real paper but means a symbol of the goods under the B/L.The British law bases the function of B/L on the commercial custom,which only needs a document to circulate on behalf of the goods itself.The function of B/L under our law should be based on the functionality comparison principle which focuses on the function of different regulations.Specifically speaking,the regulation of our nation takes the delivery of chattel as the requiremen...
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第5期93-99,共7页
Legal Forum
关键词
提单
物权效力
物权凭证
功能性比较
bill of lading
real effect
document of title
functionality comparison
