摘要
由潘萨和索恩博格创建的认知转喻学说提出,转喻是阐释各类言语行为的强大认知工具,转喻原则为话语者快速准确地找寻到符合意图的选项提供了一个自然而合理的解释方案。存在于言语行为中众多的"部分—整体"关系具有非均衡性,其中相对核心的元素更有可能替代言语行为整体而构成转喻关系。但认知转喻学说并没有深入讨论为何话语者会在许多情形中舍弃核心元素而选取边缘元素以替代整体图景。最近颇受瞩目的以认知心理学理论成果为突破口的关联理论能够在此方面予以适切的补偿性阐释。
The cognitive metonymy theory,contributed initially by Panther and Thornburg,illustrates that metonymy is a powerful explanatory device for all assortments of speech acts,which efficiently presents a natural and rational mechanism for speakers to locate intentioned alternative quickly and precisely.The 'part-whole' metonymic relationships of speech acts are asymmetric in that those comparatively central components are in more likelihood to substitute the act as integrity.However,cognitive metonymy theory ha...
出处
《大连理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2009年第2期124-128,共5页
Journal of Dalian University of Technology(Social Sciences)
基金
浙江省社会科学界联合会研究课题(08B07)
浙江工业大学人文社科重大研究项目(111000453)
关键词
言语行为
转喻
语用衍推
关联理论
speech acts
metonymy
pragmatic inference
relevance theory
