摘要
票据是具有流通性的有价证券,易被他人伪造。当出现票据伪造时,票据当事人之间的风险责任与损失分担问题就变得较为复杂。由善意的付款人还是善意的持票人承担较为合理,两大票据法系规定不一。将两大票据法系票据伪造风险负担规则进行比较,对我国票据立法的相关规定进行评析,维护当事人之间的利益平衡,更好地保障票据的流通与交易安全。
The negotiable instrument,as a security with liquidity,can be easily forged by others.When instrument forgery emerges,it becomes more complicated among note parties about their responsibilities of risk and the allocation of loss.As to the good faith payer and holder,of whom is the more reasonable undertaker,the two systems of bill laws make different provisions.Based on comparing and referencing to the two systems of instrument laws,this paper analyzes our instrument law while putting forward proposals to i...
出处
《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》
2009年第2期54-57,共4页
Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law
关键词
票据法
票据伪造
风险负担
Law of Instrument
Instrument Forgery
Risk Burden
