期刊文献+

一期多通道微创经皮肾镜钬激光碎石和单通道经皮肾镜碎石治疗鹿角形肾结石的对照研究 被引量:27

Comparsion study between the multiple tracts minimally invasively percutaneous nephrolithotomy combined with holmium laser in a single session and single tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the staghorn calculi
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较一期多通道微创经皮肾镜联合输尿管镜钬激光碎石(multi-MPCNL组)与单通道MPCNL结合ESWL(single-MPCNL组)治疗鹿角形肾结石的疗效。方法2005年9月~2007年9月对48例鹿角形肾结石患者进行随机分组,其中multi-MPCNL组治疗27例、single-MPCNL组治疗21例,比较两组的手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、输血率、并发症发生率,术后3个月随访并评价结石清除率和治疗费用。结果与single-MPCNL组相比,multi-MPCNL组手术时间短([123±26)minvs(167±31)min,t=5.35,P=0.000],术后住院时间短([4.62±1.42)dvs(5.90±1.81)d,t=2.74,P=0.009],总治疗费用低([79.11±9.87)vs(98.81±10.34)×100元,t=6.71,P=0.000];但手术前后血红蛋白下降、输血率和并发症发生率等差异均无显著性。术后3个月,multi-MPCNL组结石清除率稍高于single-MPCNL组[88.89%(24/27)vs76.19%(16/21),χ2=0.610,P=0.435]。结论一期多通道微创经皮肾镜联合输尿管镜钬激光碎石治疗鹿角形肾结石取石速度快,住院时间短,恢复快,结石清除率较高,并发症低,经济方便,可作为较大鹿角形肾结石治疗的首选治疗方法。 [Objective] To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of the multiple tracts minimally invasively pertutaneous nephrolithotomy combined with ureteroscope holmium laser (multi-MPCNL) in a single session compared with the procedures of requiring a single tract (single-MPCNL) combined with ESWL(extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy) for the renal staghorn calculi. [Methods] Clinical data of 48 cases of staghorn calculi was analysed from September 2005 to September 2007, including 27 cases treated by mult...
出处 《中国内镜杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第9期906-909,共4页 China Journal of Endoscopy
关键词 鹿角形肾结石 微创经皮肾镜碎石术 钬激光 renal staghorn calculi minimally invasively percutaneous nephrolithotomy holmium laser
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献17

  • 1曾国华,李逊,何朝辉,单炽昌,袁坚,陈文忠,王露萍,吴开俊.微创经皮肾取石术和传统经皮肾镜取石术对肾皮质损伤的比较[J].中华实验外科杂志,2004,21(12):1551-1552. 被引量:118
  • 2Lahme S, Bichler K H, Strohmaier W L, et al. Minimally invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and calyceal stones. Eur Urol, 2001, 40: 619-624.
  • 3Monga M, Oglevie S. Minipercutaneous nephorlithotomy. J Endourol,2000,14:419-421.
  • 4Mahesh R, Deasi M S, Frcs F, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex pediatric renal calculus disease. 2004, 18: 23-27.
  • 5Nguyen H C, Tan Y H, Wong M Y, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of complex upper urinary tract calculi: the singapore general hospital experience. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 2003,32: 570-574.
  • 6Atallah N, Slaba S, Karam R, et al. Complications of percutaneous nephrostomy. Apropos of 481 procedures: the value of puncture of the median calices. J Med Liban, 1999,47:92-94.
  • 7Radecka E, Brehmer M, Holmgren K, et al. Complications associated with percutaneous nephrolithotripsy:supra- versus subcostal access. A retrospective study. Acta Radiol,2003,44:447-451.
  • 8Gupta R, Kumar A, Kapoor R, et al. Prospective evaluation of safety and efficacy of the supracostal approach for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BJU Int,2002,90:809-813.
  • 9Glenn MP, Dean GA, James EL, et al. AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculus: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol, 2005,173 : 1991- 2000.
  • 10Buchholz NP. Three-dimensional CT scan stone reconstruction for planning of percutaneous surgery in a morbidly obese patient. Urol Int,2000,65:46-48.

共引文献225

同被引文献223

引证文献27

二级引证文献252

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部