非实验数据政策效应评估理论与实证研究方法被引量：10

Evaluation Methods and Empirical Analysis for Non-Experimental Data

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要非实验数据政策效应的研究是管理科学研究中的一个重要方向。政策效应评估理论在国外研究发展已经有很多年历史,但国内这一领域的研究甚少。基于此,本文对政策效应评估理论和实证研究方法做了一个较为全面的概括,侧重介绍了目前常用的三种评估方法:选择修正法、DID法和匹配法,并就一些我们在实际问题处理过程中需要注意的问题进行了探讨。 The research of effect evaluation for non-experimental data is an important research field in management science.Although the effect evaluation theory has been researched for decades abroad,there is little research domestic.Based on such situation,this paper lays out effect evaluation theory and empirical analysis methods,and considers three main methods involved: Heckman Correction Method,Difference-in-Difference Method and Matching Method.At last,we review some noticeable aspects in practice.

作者舒海兵叶五一李熠熠缪柏其

机构地区中国科学技术大学统计与金融系

出处《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 2007年第6期140-148,共9页 Chinese Journal of Management Science

基金安徽省教育厅资助项目国家自然科学基金资助项目(10471135) 中科院创新基金

关键词政策效应评估选择修正法 DID法匹配法 effect evaluation heckman selection method difference-in-differences method matching method

分类号 F830.9 [经济管理—金融学]

作者简介舒海兵(1980-),男(汉族),安徽芜湖人,中国科学技术大学统计与金融系博士研究生,研究方向:金融工程.

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献53

1[1]Fisher,R.A.The Design of Experiments[M].Edinburgh:Oliver & Boyd,1951.
2[2]Heckman,J.,J.and E.Vytlacil.Econometric Evaluation of Social Programs,Part Ⅰ:Causal Models,Structural Models and Econometric Policy Evaluation[M].Handbook of Econometrics,Volume 6.Amsterdam:Elsevier,2006.
3[3]Heckman,J.,J.and E.Vytlacil.Econometric Evaluation of Social Programs,Part Ⅱ:Using Economic Choice Theory and the Marginal Treatment Effect to Organize Alternative Econometric Methods[M].Handbook of Econometrics,Volume 6.Amsterdam:Elsevier,2006.
4[4]Heckman,J.,J.and E.Vytlacil.Econometric Evaluation of Social Programs,Part Ⅲ:Dynamics[M].Handbook of Econometrics,Volume 6.Amsterdam:Elsevier,2006.
5[5]Roy A.Some thoughts on the distribution of earnings[J].Oxford Economic Papers,1951,3:135-146.
6[6]Cochran,W.and D.Rubin.Controlling bias in observational studies[C],Sankyha,1973,35:417-446.
7[7]Rubin,D.Matching to remove bias in observational studies[J].Biometrics,1973,29:159-83.
8[8]Rubin,D.Matching methods that are equal percent bias reducing:Some examples[J].Biometrics,1976,32:109-20.
9[9]Rubin,D..Using multivariate matched sampling and regression adjustment to control bias in observational studies[J].Journal of the American Statistical Association,1979.74:318-328.
10[10]Heckman,J..Shadow Prices,Market Wages,and Labor Supply[J].Econometrica,1974,42 (4):679 -694.