摘要
《辨骚》是《文心雕龙》中争议最多的一篇,争议的一些焦点至今没有得到令人信服的解释.准确把握《辨骚》的行文逻辑是疏解争议的关键.作为论述圣哲经典对于文学创作的意义的“文之枢纽”的一部分,《辨骚》是要论述《楚辞》对于文学创作的意义.由于汉人围绕《楚辞》符不符合经展开过激烈的争论,刘勰提倡“宗经”自然要辨析经与骚的异同,否则会发生淆乱.通过比对,刘勰发现骚与经有四同四异,“四同”是对骚继承经的精神的充分肯定,“四异”则是对《楚辞》不符合经的精神的指摘.刘勰对《楚辞》的评价不存在“先贬后褒”的矛盾.所谓的“先贬”是针对尽善尽美的经而言的,“后褒”是针对“词赋之英杰”而言的,两者论述的角度不同.刘勰辨析《楚辞》与经的异同不是为了“翼圣尊经”或者楚辞论,而是为了确立对待《楚辞》的正确态度.
“Bian Sao”is the most controversial article in Wen Xin Diao Long,and some controversial focuses have so far not been convincingly explained Accurately grasping the logic of"Bian Sao"is the key to dissolving the controversy.As a part of the discourse on the significance of the classic of the sages to the literary creation,"Bian Sao"is to discuss the meaning of Chu Ci for literary creation,Since the people of Han Dynasty did not conform to the heated debate on the Chu Ci,liuxie advocated"classic"naturally must distinguish between the similarities and differences between"Jing"and"Sao",otherwise confusion will occur.By comparison,liu xie found that“Sao”and“Jing”havefour similarities and four differences,and"four similarities"was the full affirmation of the spirit of the inheritance of"Sao",and“four differences"was the criticism of the spirit of Chu Ci,Liu Xie’s appraisal of Chu Ci does not exist the front is positive and the back is negative.The so-called“the front is positive”is aimed at the perfection of the classics,and“the back is negative”is aimed at"the hero of CiFu”,which is different from the perspective of the two.Liu Xie's analysis of the similarities and differences between“Jing"and“Sao”is neither for“saint and classic”,nor for the discussion of Chu Ci,but to establish the correct attitude towards ChuCi.
出处
《古代文学理论研究》
CSSCI
2018年第1期118-132,共15页
Studies of Ancient Chinese Literary Theory
基金
中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2015M581033)阶段性成果。
关键词
《辨骚》
四异
先贬后褒
主旨
"Bian Sao"
four different
the front is positive and the back is negative
theme
