期刊文献+

Reliability and validity of the translated Chinese version of Autism Spectrum Rating Scale (2-5 years) 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
摘要 Background Early autism screening is of great value,but there is lack of a screening tool of early age (2-5 years) in China.The Autism Spectrum Rating Scale (ASRS,2-5 years) is a newly developed autism screening tool in the USA.This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the translated Chinese version of ASRS (C_ASRS) in Chinese children population before its application in China for early autism screening.Methods Caregivers of general children aged 2-5 years from 17 kindergartens and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) cases from five special education schools in five cities were recruited to complete the C_ASRS.1910 valid questionnaires from kindergarteners and 192 from ASD cases were included for analyses.Results The item reliability (Cronbach's alpha) was more than 0.80 in the screening scale and DSM-5 scale,and 0.51-0.81 in the treatment scale.ASD cases scored higher on total score and most subscales compared to the kindergarteners (Cohen's d ranging from 1.34 to 3.37).C_ASRS showed good discriminatory validity with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.850 (95% confidence interval:0.819-0.881).The cutoff ≥ 60 achieved sensitivity of 65.63% and specificity of 85.63% in discriminating autism children from the general population.Conclusion The results indicate that C_ASRS (2-5 years) could be used as an early level-2 screening tool for autism screening in China and should be further revised for level-1 screening.
出处 《World Journal of Pediatrics》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2019年第1期49-56,共8页 世界儿科杂志(英文版)
作者简介 Yi Wang yiwang@shmu.edu.cn
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献13

  • 1Lai MC, Lombardo MV, Baron-Cohen S. Autism[J]. Lancet, 2014, 383(9920): 896-910.
  • 2Falco M. Autism rates now in 1 in 68 US children: CDC[N]. CNN News, 2014.
  • 3Goldstein S, Naglieri JA. Autism spectrum rating scalesTM[DB/ OL]. (2009)[2013 - 11 ]. http://www.mhs.corn/product.aspx?gr=ed u&prod=asrs&id=overview.
  • 4Kvamme O J, Mainz J, Helin A, et al. Interpretation of questionnaires. A translation method problem [J]. Nord Med, 1998, 113(10): 363-366.
  • 5Bollen KA. Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences[J]. Annu Rev Psychol, 2002, 53: 605-634.
  • 6Rajamani KT, Styner MA, Talib H, et al. Statistical deformable bone models for robust 3D surface extrapolation from sparse data[J]. Med Image Anal, 2007, 11 (2): 99-109.
  • 7Champlain AF. Best-fit model of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the 2010 Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination Part I clinical decision-making cases[J]. J Educ Eval Health Prof, 2015, 12: 11.
  • 8Chen PY, Yang CM, Morin CM. Validating the cross-cultural factor structure and invariance property of the Insomnia Severity Index: evidence based on ordinal EFA and CFA[J]. Sleep Med, 2015, 16(5): 598-603.
  • 9温忠麟,侯杰泰.检验的临界值:真伪差距多大才能辨别?--评《不同条件下拟合指数的表现及临界值的选择》[J].心理学报,2008,40(1):119-124. 被引量:31
  • 10蒋小花,沈卓之,张楠楠,廖洪秀,徐海燕.问卷的信度和效度分析[J].现代预防医学,2010,37(3):429-431. 被引量:316

共引文献14

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部