期刊文献+

两种疝修补术疗效临床对比观察报告

Two Kinds of Hernia Repair Clinical Efficacy Comparsion Observation Report
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术与传统疝修补术的临床疗效。方法98例腹股沟疝患者分为Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术组(A组)及传统疝修补术组(B组)各49例,比较分析两组平均手术时间与平均切口疼痛时间、尿潴留、住院时间、复发率情况。结果 A组治疗效果明显优于B组。结论 Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术安全,疗效可靠。 Objective To compare the clinical ef ect of Lichtenstein tension free hernioplasty and traditional hernioplasty.Methods 98 cases of inguinal hernia were divided into Lichtenstein tension free hernioplasty group(group A)and traditional hernioplasty group(B group)49 cases,comparative analysis of two groups of average operation time and average incision pain,urinary retention time,hospital stay,recurrence rate.Results in A group was obviously bet er than that of B group.Conclusion Lichtenstein tension free hernia repair is safe,reliable curative ef ect.
作者 贵言平 GUI Yan-ping(Hubei Province Wuhan City Caidian District Emergency Center,Wuhan Hubei 430100,China)
出处 《医学信息(医学与计算机应用)》 2014年第9期456-456,共1页 Medical Information
关键词 腹股沟疝 Lichtenstein疝修补术 传统疝修补术 Lichtenstein inguinal hernia Hernia repair Traditional hernioplasty
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献12

共引文献196

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部