期刊文献+

剖宫产术采用硬膜外麻醉与腰硬联合麻醉的临床效果分析 被引量:2

Cesarean Section with Epidural Anesthesia and Waist Hard Joint Anesthesia Clinical Effect Analysis
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同麻醉方式在剖宫产术中的临床效果。方法收集我院行剖宫产术的产妇200例,按麻醉方式不同分为A组(硬膜外麻醉)100例和B组(腰硬联合麻醉)100例,观察对照两组临床效果。结果麻醉起效时间、肌松满意度、镇痛效果腰硬联合麻醉明显优于硬膜外麻醉,两组比较差异有统计学意义(<0.05);术中不良反应(低血压、恶心)发生率,腰硬联合组高于硬膜外组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(<0.05);其他情况没有统计学意义(跃0.05)。结论不同麻醉方式各有利弊,在可控性的预防低血压的情况下,腰硬联合麻醉方式在剖腹产中的应用更优于硬膜外麻醉。 Objective To study the clinical ef ect of dif erent anesthesia in cesarean section.Methods Ol ecting 200 cases of maternal line of cesarean section in our,according to dif erent anesthesia were divided into group A(epidural)100 cases and group B(waist hard joint anesthesia)of 100 cases clinical ef ect observation contrast two groups.Results Anesthesia work time and the degree of muscle relaxant and analgesic effect is obviously bet er than the waist hard joint anesthesia epidural anesthesia,the more similar between the two groups was statistically significant(<0.05);Incidence of adverse reactions(hypotension,nausea),waist hard joint than epidural group,two groups compare the dif erence was statistical y significant(<0.05);Otherwise no statistical significance(>0.05).Conclusion The advantages and disadvantages of each different anesthesia in prevention of hypotension of control ability,waist hard joint anesthesia in cesarean section,the application of more is bet er than that of epidural anesthesia.
作者 袁波 张红 YUAN Bo;ZHANG Hong(Yining City,Xinjiang Four Division Hospital,Yining 835000,Xinjiang,China)
出处 《医学信息(医学与计算机应用)》 2014年第27期215-215,共1页 Medical Information
关键词 剖宫产术 腰硬联合麻醉 硬膜外麻醉 Cesarean section Waist hard joint anesthesia Epidural anesthesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献31

  • 1黄海霞.罗哌卡因与布比卡因在剖宫产手术中麻醉效果的比较[J].中国健康月刊,2011,30:252-253.
  • 2Choi DH,Kim JA,Chung IS.Comparison of combined apinal anesthesia and epidural anesthesia for cesarean section.Acta Anaesth Scand,2004,44(2):214~219.
  • 3Verccauteren M,Vereechen K,La-Malfa M,et al.Costerffectiveness of analgesia after caesarean section:a comparison of intrathecal morphine and epidural PCA.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2002,46(1):85~89.
  • 4Flisberg P,Rudin A,Linner R,et al.Pain relief and safety after major surgery:a prospective study of epidural and intravenous analgesia in 2696 patients.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2003,47(4):457~465.
  • 5Jeff Gadsden,Sturt Hart.Alan,C Santos.Post-cesarean delivery analgesia.Anesth Analg,2005,101(5):62~69.
  • 6吴大胜,孙洪河.多种麻醉方法在剖宫产手术中的临床观察[J].中国妇幼保健,2007,22(35):4974-4975. 被引量:17
  • 7Asehnoune K,Larousse E,Tadie J M. Small dose bupivaeaine-sufentanil pre vents cardiac output modifications after spinal anesthesia[J].Anesthesia and Analgesia,2005,(5):1512.doi:10.1213/01.ANE.0000180996.91358.CC.
  • 8戴罗勇,程爱花,张先超.腰硬联合与单纯硬膜外麻醉在剖宫产术中应用的比较[J].浙江临床医学,2008,10(3):399-399. 被引量:1
  • 9龚艳敏.剖宫产手术中麻醉问题的探讨[J].亚太传统医药,2008,4(10):62-63. 被引量:5
  • 10邹家平,曹少珍,傅丽英.腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉与硬膜外麻醉用于剖宫产术的比较[J].医学理论与实践,2009,22(3):317-319. 被引量:9

同被引文献10

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部