期刊文献+

瑞芬太尼与芬太尼麻醉诱导在老年患者支撑喉镜术的效果比较

在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察瑞芬太尼诱导麻醉在老年患者支撑喉镜手术的应用效果以及与使用芬太尼诱导麻醉效果的比较。方法选择ASA I-II级择期行支撑喉镜手术的老年患者40例,随机分为瑞芬太尼组(R组)和芬太尼组(F组)。观察两组患者围手术期血流动力学变化,术毕呼吸恢复和拔管时间。结果在加用喉部表面麻醉的情况下,R组在气管插管、支撑喉镜置入2min时与入室时比较均比F组平稳。R组呼吸恢复时间、拔管时间均比F组短。结论瑞芬太尼诱导麻醉比芬太尼诱导麻醉用于老年患者支撑喉镜手术,具有循环平稳,苏醒迅速彻底的优点,是一种较好的麻醉方式。
作者 李宏 陈赛泉
出处 《医学信息(医学与计算机应用)》 2014年第30期250-251,共2页 Medical Information
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献19

  • 1Glass PS, Gan TJ, Howell S. A review of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. Anesth Analg, 1999, 89(4 Suppl):S7-14.
  • 2Vuyk J, Mertens M J, Olofsen E, et al. Propofol anesthesia and rational opioid selection: determination of optimal EC50-EC90 propofal-opioid concentrations that assure adequate anesthesia and a rapid return of consciousness. Anesthesiology, 1997, 87: 1549
  • 3Vuyk J, Engbers FH, Burm AG, et al. Pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and alfentanil when given for induction of anesthesia.Anesthesiology, 1996, 84: 288-299.
  • 4Smith C, McEwan AI, Jhaveri R, et al. The interaction of fentanyl on the Cp50 of propofol for loss of consciousness and skin incision.Anesthesiology, 1994, 81: 820-828.
  • 5V uyk J, Engbers FH, Lemmens HJ, et al. Pharmacodynamics of propofol in female patients. Anesthesiology, 1992, 77: 3-9.
  • 6Vuyk J, Lim T, Engber FH, et al. The pharmacodynamic interaction of propofol and alfentanil during lower abdominal surgery in women.Anesthesiology, 1995, 83: 8-22.
  • 7Thompson JP, Hall AP, Russell J, et al. Effect of remifentanil on the haemodynamic response to orotracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth, 1998,80: 467-469.
  • 8Schuttler J, Albrecht S, Breivik H, et al. A comparison of remifcntanil and alfcntanil in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.Anaesthesia, 1997,52: 307-317.
  • 9Hogue CW, Bowdle TA, O'Leary C, et al. A multiconter evaluation of total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil and propofol for elective inpatient surgery. Anesth Analg, 1996,83:279-285.
  • 10Sneyd JR, Camu F, Doenicke A, et al. Remifentanil and fentanyl during anaesthesia for major abdominal and gynaecological surgery. An open,comparative study of sffety and efficacy. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2001,18:605-614.

共引文献238

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部