期刊文献+

慢性疼痛患者恐动水平与生活质量的相关性分析 被引量:4

Correlation analysis between fear level and quality of life in patients with chronic pain
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 调查慢性疼痛患者恐动水平及生活质量现状,探讨两者之间的关系.方法 选取2018年3月至4月,采用便利抽样法,应用一般情况调查表、长海痛尺、恐动症Tampa评分量表(TSK)及简明健康状况量表(SF-12)对浙江省3家三甲医院疼痛门诊的慢性疼痛患者进行问卷调查,并对调查结果进行分析.结果 被调查的176名门诊慢性疼痛患者中,恐动水平分值(36.51±7.22),生活质量分值(44.75±9.13),恐动症比例达42.61%,两组在简明健康状况量表(SF-12)中两个方面即生理总评分(PCS)、心理总评分(MSC)差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01),慢性疼痛患者生活质量与恐动水平呈显著负相关关系(r=-0.565、-0.602,P<0.01).结论 慢性疼痛患者恐动水平越高,生活质量越低,可以通过早期筛查恐动症,实施综合干预手段降低慢性疼痛患者恐动症的发生,提高患者生活质量. Objective To investigate the level of Kinesiophobia and quality of life in patients with chronic pain and to explore the relationship between them. Methods From March to April 2018,the patients with chronic pain in pain clinics of three first-class hospitals in Zhejiang Province were investigated by convenience sampling,general situation questionnaire,Changhai Pain Scale,Tampa Score Scale (TSK) and Simple Health Status Scale (SF-12),and the results were analyzed. Results Of 176 outpatient surveyed in patients with chronic pain,Kinesiophobia level score was (36.51±7.22),the quality of life score was(44.75±9.13),Kinesiophobia was as high as 42.61%,two groups in the concise health questionnaire (SF-12)two aspects namely physiological total score(PCS),psychological total score(MSC)had significant difference(P<0.01),the quality of life in chronic pain patients and Kinesiophobia level was significantly negative correlation(r=0.565,-0.602,P<0.01). Conclusions The higher the level of fear in patients with chronic pain,the lower the quality of life. We can reduce the occurrence of fear in patients with chronic pain and improve the quality of life by early screening and comprehensive intervention.
出处 《浙江临床医学》 2019年第1期109-110,113,共3页 Zhejiang Clinical Medical Journal
关键词 慢性疼痛 恐动 生活质量 相关性 Chronic pain Kinesiophobia Quality of life Correlation
作者简介 通信作者:范耀华
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献51

  • 1郑磊磊,王也玲,李惠春.医院焦虑抑郁量表在综合性医院中的应用[J].上海精神医学,2003,15(5):264-266. 被引量:267
  • 2贺远龙,刘斌.健康相关生命质量[J].现代诊断与治疗,2004,15(6):362-363. 被引量:27
  • 3Aaronson NK, Meyerowitz BE, Bard M, et al. Quality of life research in oncology. Past achievements and future priorities[ J]. Cancer, 1991,67(3 Suppl) : 839-843.
  • 4Katz S. The science of quality of life[ J]. J Chronic Dis, 1987,40 (6) :459-463.
  • 5Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity[J]. Med Care,1996,34(3) :220-23.3.
  • 6Lacson E Jr, Xu J, Lin SF,et aL A comparison of SF-36 and SF- 12 composite scores and subsequent hospitalization and mortality risks in long-term dialysis patients[ J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2010,5 (2) :252-260. doi : 10. 2215/CJN. 07231009.
  • 7Kontodimopoulos N, Pappa E, Niakas D, et al. Validity of SF-12 summary scores in a Greek general population [ J ]. Health Qual Life Outcomes ,2007,5:55. doi : 10,1186/1477-7525-5-55.
  • 8Failde I, Medina P, Ramirez C, et al. Construct and criterion validity of the SF-12 health questionnaire in patients with acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina[ J]. J Eva! Clin Pract, 2010, 16 (3) : 569-573. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1365-2753. 2009. 01161.x.
  • 9Luo X, George ML, Kakouras I, et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the short form 12-item survey (SF-12) in patients with back pain [ J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2003,28 ( 15 ) : 1739-1745.
  • 10a Failde I, Medina P, Ramirez C, et al. Assessing health-related quality of life among coronary patients: SF-36 vs SF-12[ J]. Public Health,2009,123 (9) : 615-617. doi: 10. 1016/j. puhe. 2009.07.013.

共引文献83

同被引文献31

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部