摘要
目的研究两种换药方式对糖尿病足康复护理的效果观察.方法在2017年11月—2019年6月期间,选取48例于该院治疗的糖尿病足患者,采用随机法分为研究组和参照组,每组24例.参照组使用莫匹罗星治疗,研究组采取墨尼克治疗.治疗后对比两组患者的治疗效果与并发症发生率.结果经治疗,对比两组患者的治疗效果,研究组明显高于参照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);另外,对比两组患者的并发症发生情况,研究组低于参照组,数据差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论相比于莫匹罗星治疗,墨尼克对糖尿病足患者的疗效改善效果明显,同时能显著降低并发症发生,具有应用价值.
Objective to study the effect of two drug exchange methods on diabetic foot rehabilitation nursing.Methods From November 2017 to June 2019,48 patients with diabetic foot treated in our hospital were randomly divided into study group and control group,with 24 patients in each group.The control group was treated with more than 100 states,while the study group was treated with mennick.After treatment,the therapeutic effect and complication rate of the two groups were compared.Results After treatment,the treatment effect of the two groups of patients,the study group was significantly higher than the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).In addition,comparing the incidence of complications between the two groups,the study group was lower than the control group,and the data were different(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with baidubang treatment,menique can improve the efficacy of diabetic foot patients significantly,and reduce the incidence of complications.
作者
张中华
ZHANG Zhonghua(Daqing Oilfield General Hospital,Daqing Heilongjiang,163001,China)
出处
《反射疗法与康复医学》
2020年第2期147-148,共2页
Reflexology And Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词
两种换药方式
糖尿病足
效果观察
Two ways of changing dressing
Diabetic foot
Results observation
作者简介
张中华(1984-),女,吉林公主岭人,本科,主管护师,研究方向:外科护理。