期刊文献+

输尿管结石致肾绞痛早期行输尿管镜钬激光碎石术的疗效评价 被引量:1

Evaluation of the efficacy of early ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for renal colic caused by ureteral calculi
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探求肾绞痛发作不同时期对行输尿管镜钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管中下段结石的疗效影响.方法回顾性收集2021年11月—2023年6月南京医科大学附属常州第二人民医院泌尿外科因输尿管中下段结石行输尿管镜钬激光碎石术的患者154例,分为两组,观察组115例,为肾绞痛首次发作14 d内接受手术治疗的患者;对照组39例,为肾绞痛发作超过14 d接受手术治疗的患者,比较两组的手术时间、输尿管狭窄发生概率、一次结石清除率、术前感染情况及拔管时间.结果对照组手术时间显著长于观察组(P<0.05),输尿管狭窄的发生率大于观察组(P<0.05),两组的一次结石清除率、术前感染情况及拔管时间均无明显差异(P>0.05).结论中下段输尿管结石的患者在肾绞痛发作后14 d内,接受输尿管镜激光碎石术可缩短手术时间,降低输尿管狭窄的发生概率,及时缓解患者痛苦. Objective To investigate the effect of different stages of renal colic on the treatment of middle and lower ureteral calculi with ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy.Methods Data of 154 patients with middle and lower ureteral calculi who underwent ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy were retrospectively collected and patients were divided into two groups.115 cases in the observation group were treated with surgery within 14 days of the first attack of renal colic,and 39 cases in the control group were treated with surgery more than 14 days after renal colic attack.The operation time,probability of ureteral stricture,primary stone clearance rate,preoperative infection and extubation time were compared between the two groups.Results The operation time of the control group was significantly longer than that of the observation group(P<0.05),and the incidence of ureteral stricture was higher than that of the observation group(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in the stone clearance rate,preoperative infection and extubation time(P>0.05)between the two groups.Conclusion Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for patients with middle and lower ureteral calculi within 14 days after the onset of renal colic can shorten the operation time,reduce the incidence of ureteral stricture,and relieve the pain of patients in time.
作者 张力 高磊 史晓凯 鹿超 白禹 高生林 左立 张力峰 ZHANG Li;GAO Lei;SHI Xiaokai;LU Chao;BAI Yu;GAO Shenglin;ZUO Li;ZHANG Lifeng(Department of Urology,the Affiliated Changzhou No.2 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Changzhou,Jiangsu 213000,China;Graduate School of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210000,China;Graduate School of Dalian Medical University,Dalian,Liaoning 116000,China)
出处 《手术电子杂志》 2024年第1期32-35,共4页 Electronic Journal of Medical Operations
基金 国家自然科学基金(81902565)
关键词 输尿管结石 肾绞痛 经尿道输尿管镜碎石术 ureteral calculi nephric colic transurethral ureteroscopic lithotripsy
作者简介 通讯作者:张力峰,Email:nylikky@njmu.edu.cn
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献38

  • 1徐文芳,曾小明,余明主,谭公祥,郑惠杰.两种手术方案对>60 mL的良性前列腺增生患者尿流动力学及性功能的影响[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2019,0(6):399-403. 被引量:4
  • 2卫生部关于二级以上综合医院感染性疾病科建设的通知[J].中华人民共和国卫生部公报,2004(10):52-52. 被引量:4
  • 3王文章,何家扬,张燕宾.ESWL治疗复杂上尿路结石的体会[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2001,6(4):27-29. 被引量:1
  • 4何家扬,张燕宾,马凤宁.尿石症住院患者1100例分析[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2005,10(3):158-160. 被引量:39
  • 5JONATHAN M, FLALKOV SPH, BERNAROL F, et al.Reassessing the efficacy of the dornier MFL-5000 lithotriptor [J]. J Urol,2000, 164 (9): 640-643.
  • 6PEARLE MS, NADLER R, BERCOWSKY E, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for management of distal ureteral calculi[J]. J Urol, 2001, 166(4): 1255-1260.
  • 7PESCHEL R, JANETSCHEK G, BARTSCH G. Extraeorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi: a prospective randomized study[J]. J Urol 1999, 162(6): 1909-1912.
  • 8GHALAYINI IF, AL-GHAZO MA, KHADER YS. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal ureteric calculi: efficacy and patient satisfaction[J]. Int Braz J Urol. 2006, 32(6): 656-667.
  • 9SHAH OD, MATLAGA BR, ASSIMOS DG. Selecting treatment for distal ureteral calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroseopy[J]. Rev Urol, 2003, 5(1): 40-44.
  • 10那彦群.实用泌尿外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:145-147.

共引文献214

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部