摘要
章学诚文论侧重史学的特质,本质上与桐城文论出发点不同,然在史文话语的构建层面,二者不谋而合,然学界对此少见讨论。他对归有光五色圈评《史记》、方苞删削古文的批评,以及对寿序、墓志等应酬文体体性认知方面,对于理解桐城派的文论内涵,具有较为重要的参照意义。他还重视采用"文用"的文学批评理念,这与桐城派对寿序的认识与创作实践相一致,二者能在文学的维度产生融通与共鸣。
Zhang Xuecheng’s literary theory focuses on the characteristics of history,which is essentially different from Tongcheng’s literary theory.However,in the construction level of historical discourse,they happen to coincide,which is rarely discussed in academic circles.His criticism of Gui Youguang’s comments of five color circle on The Historical Records,Fang Bao’s abridgement of ancient prose,and his cognition of ShouXu(寿序),epitaph and other entertainment styles are of great significance for understanding the connotation of Tongcheng School’s literary theory.He also attached importance to the literary criticism concept of“literary use”(文用),which is consistent with Tongcheng School’s understanding and creative practice of ShouXu(寿序),and they can produce harmony and resonance in the dimension of literature.
出处
《古代文学理论研究》
2021年第2期686-706,共21页
Studies of Ancient Chinese Literary Theory
基金
安徽高校协同创新项目“桐城派名家家风家训资料整理与研究”(GXXT2021013)阶段性成果
安徽大学新进教师启动项目“桐城派的阅读、知识谱系及其流派风格研究”
关键词
章学诚
桐城派
《史记》
方苞
寿序
Zhang Xuecheng
Tongcheng School
The Historical Records
Fang Bao
ShouXu
