期刊文献+

中国对世界贸易组织裁决的执行——基于比较分析的视角

China’s Compliance with WTO’s Rulings:A Comparative Analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 在国际贸易领域,指责中国不遵守世贸组织规则的声音不绝于耳。世贸组织成员是否遵守了世贸组织规则,一个重要的检验标准在于该成员对世贸组织裁决的执行。本文将从执行时间及执行质量两方面,比较中国的执行状况与美国、欧盟、印度、巴西等世贸组织成员执行状况的差异。本文认为,国际社会结构的特殊性,世贸组织作为国际法治典范的不足及裁决本身存在的问题,导致世贸组织成员难以完全执行所有裁决。鉴于此,中国虽同其他国家一样无法完全执行所有的裁决,但在总体上,不管是同作为发达国家或地区代表的美国及欧盟相比较,还是同作为发展中国家的印度与巴西相对比,中国执行裁决的表现都极为出色。这充分体现了中国对世贸组织规则的尊重,展现了中国对维护世贸组织法治化所作出的贡献。 In the field of international trade,accusations against China’s non-compliance with WTO rules are endless.One test of whether a WTO member has complied with WTO rules is the implementation of WTO rulings by the member.This paper will compare the compliance status of China with the compliance status of WTO members such as the United States,the European Union,India,and Brazil,from the aspects of timeliness and quality of compliance actions.This paper argues that the particularity of the structure of the international community,the inadequacy of the WTO as a model of international rule of law,and the problems with the rulings themselves make it difficult for WTO members to fully comply with all rulings.In view of this,although China,like other WTO members,is unable to fully comply with all the rulings,in general,whether it is compared with the United States and the European Union,which are representatives of developed countries or regions,or India and Brazil,which are developing countries,China’s compliance with the rulings has been excellent.This fully reflects China’s respect for WTO rules and its contribution to safeguarding the rule of law of WTO.
作者 王倩慧 WANG Qianhui
机构地区 北京大学法学院
出处 《中国国际法年刊》 2019年第1期-,共28页 Chinese Yearbook Of International Law
关键词 中国 世贸组织裁决 执行 争端解决机制 China WTO rulings compliance dispute settlement mechanism
作者简介 王倩慧,北京大学法学院国际公法方向博士研究生。
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献101

  • 1《国际法院规约》第59条
  • 2Markus Burgstaller, Theories of Compliance with International Law, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005.
  • 3" Brazil Post- pones Decision on Cotton Retaliation until End of February", Inside U.S. Trade, December 19, 2013.
  • 4http ://www.wto.org/english/tratop e/dispu_e/dispu_by_country_e.htm, last accessed on January 24, 2014.
  • 5Improving the Special and Differential Provisions in the Dispute Settlement Understanding, Communication from China, TN/DS/W/29, 22 January 2003.
  • 6Specific Amendments to the Dispute Settlement Understanding-Drafting Inputs from China, Communication from China, TN/DS/W/51, 5 March 2003; Responses to Questions on the Specific Input of China, Communication from China, TN/DS/W/57,19 May 2003.
  • 7Timothy Webster, "Paper Compliance: How China Implements WTO Decisions", Forthcoming in Michigan Journal of International Law, http ://ssm.com/abstract = 2312877, last accessed on August 19, 2013.
  • 8European Commission, "Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Concern- ing the Exercise of the Union' s Rights for the Application and Enforcement of International Trade Rules", Brussels, 18. 12.2012, COM (2012) 773 final, 2012/0359 (COD).
  • 9Richard K. Gardiner, Treaty Interpretation, Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 52 - 53.
  • 10Anthony Aust, Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 2nd ed. , Cambridge University Press, 2008, p. 230.

共引文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部