摘要
本文从分析私营军事安保公司提供的军事和安保业务模式入手,分析各种相关概念,认为研究私营军事安保公司问题的重点不在于其概念而在于业务模式。私营军事安保公司并非国际法意义上的雇佣军。联合国《供人权理事会审议并采取行动的关于私营军事和保安公司的可能公约草案》中有关政府职能外包化和政府固有职能的争议是当前国际社会关注的焦点,但是关于政府固有职能在国际法上并没有明确界定,各国在规则发展过程中应进一步明确其内涵。中国应有效参与规范私营军事安保公司的国际法规则的创建,并在"一带一路"建设过程中构建符合自身需求的海外安保服务体系。
This article analyzes the business models of private military and security companies and various related concepts. The article finds that the most important issue of studying private military and security companies is not its concept but its business mode. Private military security companies are not mercenaries within the meaning of international law. The disputes concerning the outsourcing of government functions and the inherently governmental functions in the possible Draft Convention on Private Military and Security Companies(PMSCs) for consideration and action by the Human Rights Council are the focus of the current international community. But the inherently governmental functions are not clearly defined in international law, and States should further clarify their connotation in the process of rules development. During the construction of "One Belt, One Road", China should participate effectively in the construction of the rules of international law for private military security companies, and develop overseas security service system to its own demands.
出处
《国际法学刊》
2020年第1期106-121,158,共17页
Journal of International Law
关键词
私营军事安保公司
政府固有职能
海外安保服务
private military and security companies
inherently governmental functions
overseas security services
作者简介
颜苏,法学博士,北京工商大学法学院副教授。
